NON-COOPERATION WITH EVIL IS AS MUCH A DUTY AS IS COOPERATION WITH GOOD (GANDHI)

NON-COOPERATION WITH EVIL IS AS MUCH A DUTY AS IS COOPERATION WITH GOOD (GANDHI)

Search This Blog

TOPICS (Number of Posts)

26/11 (17) ADIVASI (10) AMERICA (182) ANCIENT INDIA (24) ANCIENT WISDOM (37) ANDHRA PRADESH (13) AWAKENING (126) BANKING SYSTEM (107) BELIEFS (56) BIG PHARMA (24) BIOWEAPONS (39) BRICS (25) CAPITALISM (62) CASTEISM (15) CHINA (57) CIA (76) COMMUNISM (6) CONFIRMITY (44) CONSCIOUSNESS (159) CONSPIRACIES (252) CORPORATE CORRUPTION (114) CORRUPTION (74) CREATIVITY (81) DEMOCRACY (46) DEVELOPMENT (15) DISCLOSURE (15) DISPLACEMENT (8) EARTH CHANGES (34) EAST INDIA COMPANIES (19) ECONOMICS (76) EDUCATION (123) EUROPE (25) EXOPOLITICS (49) EXTRATERRESTRIAL (48) FACTS (147) FALSE FLAG (40) FARMERS SUICIDES (4) FASCISM (106) FEDERAL RESERVE (48) FREE ENERGY (18) FREEDOM (123) FREEMASONRY (14) GENOCIDE (152) GEOENGINEERING (21) GLOBAL POLITICS (286) GLOBALIZATION (13) GMO (12) GOD (10) HAARP (4) HISTORY (90) HUMAN RIGHTS (115) HYDERABAD (18) IDEOLOGIES (49) ILLUMINATI (54) ILLUSION AND REALITY (104) INDIA (187) ISIS (34) ISLAMOPHOBIA (21) ISRAEL (70) JAIN COMMISSION REPORT (5) JKRISHNAMURTI (7) KHAZARIAN MAFIA (176) LIBERALIZATION (4) LOVE (35) MAFIA (77) MAHATMA GANDHI (9) MATRIX (2) MEDIA CONTROL (5) MEDICAL MAFIA (10) MEDICAL MARIJUANA (3) MEDITATION (8) MI5 AND MI6 (4) MIND (60) MIND CONTROL (60) MINING (9) MNCs (49) MONEY MONOPOLY (73) MONSANTO (4) MOSSAD (54) MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD (11) NATIONAL SECURITY (101) NATO (12) NAZISM (32) OCCULTISM (17) ONE WORLD (37) PAKISTAN (24) PALESTINE (6) PHILOSOPHY (40) POLAVARAM PROJECT (2) POLE SHIFT (2) POLITICAL PONEROLOGY (193) POWER OF CONSCIENCE (111) PRIVATIZATION (34) PROXY WAR (109) PSYCHOLOGICAL REVOLUTION (66) PSYCHOLOGY (22) RAJIV GANDHI ASSASSINATION (8) RAW (14) RELIGIONS (34) ROTHSCHILDS (97) RUSSIA (44) SECRET SCIENCE (32) SECRET SOCIETIES (25) SECRET SPACE (20) SECULARISM (18) SELF KNOWLEDGE (60) SOCIAL ENGINEERING (60) SOLAR SYSTEM (18) SOUTH ASIA (128) SUBVERSION (173) TELANGANA (9) TERRORISM (90) TRUTH (95) UFOs (36) UNITED NATIONS (4) VACCINES (13) WAR IS A RACKET (105) WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION (25) WEAPONS OF MASS PRESCRIPTION (53) WEATHER WARS (12) WORLD SHADOW GOVERNMENT (97) WORLD WAR (12) ZIONISM (162)

I WILL TELL YOU ONE THING FOR SURE. ONCE YOU GET TO THE POINT WHERE YOU ARE ACTUALLY DOING THINGS FOR TRUTH'S SAKE, THEN NOBODY CAN EVER TOUCH YOU AGAIN BECAUSE YOU ARE HARMONIZING WITH A GREATER POWER. (George Harrison)

Return of the Guardians

Friday, March 25, 2016

Mossad Named in Brussels False Flag Bombing Attack


MARCH 24, 2016

Mossad was named by a second witness to Tuesday’s explosions at Brussels’ Zaventem airport. Mossad, the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service or ISIS (according to a CBS News national correspondent), is said by alternative news sources to have played a role in this week’s state-sponsored for-profit false flag terrorism in which two Belgian government officials were said to have tendered their resignations but were urged to stay on under conditions described as a “time of war.”

Read the complete article on NewsInsideOut.com.

Thursday, March 24, 2016

ISIS attacked Brussels? The US created ISIS? Therefore?


March 23, 2016

I want to acknowledge two researchers and reporters, whose work cuts deeply into the ISIS mirage: Tony Cartalucci and Brandon Turbeville. In a half-sane world, Cartalucci would be the international editor of the New York Times, if the Times were a real news outlet.

If we accept the premise that ISIS attacked Brussels, then the next question is: what is ISIS?

Who is behind it? Who supplies it? Who funds it? Who sustains it?

Brandon Turbeville, writing at Activist Post (“Congress Votes To Fight ISIS By Funding ISIS To Fight Assad”, 9/19/2014), states:

“Obama’s plan [is] to ‘detect and degrade’ ISIS…the reality is that the plan is nothing more than a plan to…destroy the Syrian government to benefit of ISIS and other fundamentalist groups that the United States has created, funded, trained, and directed since the very beginning of the Syrian crisis.”

Cartalucci, in an article titled, “In Syria, There No Moderates” (9/2013), writes:

“…there were never, nor are there any ‘moderates’ operating in Syria. The West has intentionally armed and funded Al Qaeda and other sectarian extremists since as early as 2007 in preparation for an engineered sectarian bloodbath serving US-Saudi-Israeli interests. This latest bid to portray the terrorists operating along and within Syria’s borders as ‘divided’ along extremists/moderate lines is a ploy to justify the continued flow of Western cash and arms into Syria to perpetuate the conflict, as well as create conditions along Syria’s borders with which Western partners, Israel, Jordan, and Turkey, can justify direct military intervention [in Syria].”

Turbeville writes:

“Indeed, even the New York Times has been forced to admit that there are, as Cartalucci expertly argues in his article, no moderates in the ranks of the Syrian death squads. As Ben Hubbard [NY Times] wrote in April, 2013 (“Islamist Rebels Create Dilemma on Syria Policy”), ‘In Syria’s largest city, Aleppo, rebels aligned with Al Qaeda control the power plant, run the bakeries and head a court that applies Islamic law. Elsewhere, they have seized government oil fields, put employees back to work and now profit from the crude they produce…Across Syria, rebel-held areas are dotted with Islamic courts staffed by lawyers and clerics, and by fighting brigades led by extremists. Even the Supreme Military Council, the umbrella rebel organization whose formation the West had hoped would sideline radical groups, is stocked with commanders who want to infuse Islamic law into a future Syrian government…Nowhere in rebel-controlled Syria is there a secular fighting force to speak of.‘” (emphasis added)

In other words, the “moderate Syrian rebels” are a fiction no one could fail to notice. The US funding has always gone to ISIS.


I could cite much more from Cartalucci and Turbeville, who effectively argue that ISIS is a created tool of the US government and its allies. I strongly recommend you read and study their work.

As far as the Brussels attacks are concerned, if we assume that ISIS was responsible, the whole scenario is turned upside down after analyzing the basis of ISIS.

The Obama administration (jointly with the Bush administration) should be announcing: “Well, we keep ISIS alive. Unfortunately, things happen. One of those things is Brussels.”

And then you could go on to query the sincerity of the word “unfortunately.”

Articles by Tony Cartalucci:





Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Wednesday, March 23, 2016

Mind Control Through Television: Violence In Media


In the first part of this Mind Control through Television Series we established the scientific basis for mind control by television and saw how multinational corporations use this psychological warfare for their vested interests. In this part we will see how Entertainment Violence impacts our children and alters their Learning Curve drastically.

Deadly Marksmanship

Michael Carneal was a 14-year-old freshman at Heath High School in Paducah, Kentucky, when he was charged with fatally shooting three students and injuring five others on December 1, 1997.

The shooting rampage, which occurred just after the student prayer meeting, killed three girls (Kayce Steger, 15; Jessica James, 17 and Nicole Hadley, 14) and wounded five other students.

‘He held the gun up in a two-handed stance. He never fired far to the left. He never fired far to the right. Never fired up. Never fired down. He just put one bullet in every target that popped up in front of him. What was he doing? He was playing a videogame… and he was racking up as high a score as he could’, says Dave Grossman, who calls his study organization on human aggression and violence the Killology Research Group.

Grossman, a Firearms Instructor for numerous military and police organizations, says the ‘average law enforcement officer in the average engagement hits (a target) about one bullet in five. It’s hard to hit moving targets, real moving targets. The reality is that the videogames train you to put one bullet in every target. (But) it’s not natural to put one bullet in every target. The natural thing to do is to fire at a target until it drops, and then go on to the next, and the next, and the next’.

The Paducah student, however, hit eight people with eight shots, results even a professional marksman would find difficult to match.

This tragic incident leaves us with many unanswered questions:

How did Michael Carneal, a 14-year-old child, acquire such skills?

Who taught him to execute the job with such accuracy?

From where did he draw the required mental and moral strength to pull the trigger on people whom he knew, careless to the fact that he was putting an end to their lives?

How desensitized can one get to do such an act? And, what is the source of such force?

Answers are never simple. But, we can always reference the available studies on the subject to find reasons.

The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry’s Facts for Family states that hundreds of studies of the effects of television violence on children and teenagers have found that children can:

Become ‘immune’ to the horror of violence;

Gradually accept violence as a way to solve problems;

Imitate the violence they observe on television;

Identify with certain character, victims and/or victimizers.

Extensive viewing of television violence by children has been proved to cause greater aggressiveness. Studies have also shown that sometimes just watching a single violent program can increase aggressiveness. Children who view shows, in which violence is very ‘realistic’, ‘frequently repeated’ or ‘unpunished’, are more likely to imitate what they see. The impact of TV violence may be immediately evident in the child’s behavior or may surface years later and young people can even be affected when the family atmosphere shows no tendency towards violence.

The Problem


Most parents are concerned about their children’s exposure to Entertainment Violence. However, the concern seemed to stop at that without saying it aloud, they all seemed to think it a ‘non-issue’. One of the reasons for this is that we (parents) grew up with Entertainment Violence ourselves and we assume that because we didn’t grew violent, our children won’t either. We also tend to focus more on the visible problems our children have, such as: falling grades in school; lack of concentration; behavioral changes and health issues.

Children’s lives can be quite problematic and although we do look to understand the reasons behind their problems, we seem to ignore the possibility that most of the difficulties could also be related to their media habits.

Multimedia related problems impacting children can be categorized into three broad factors: Time, Health and Accessibility.

Time

According to the American Academy of Pediatrics (Nov. 5, 2001): ’American children between ages 2 and 18 spend an average of six hours and 32 minutes each day using media – television, commercial or self-recorded video, movies, videogames, print, radio, recorded music, computers and the Internet’.

It is a shocking figure made even more disturbing when we consider that this figure of 6.32 hours constitutes around 40 percent of our children’s waking time. After sleep, (if they sleep well) media is the second-highest, time-consuming activity engaged in by our children, even beating the time they spend at school and the time they spend with parents or friends. This is a worrying reality and one that we should act upon. According to the American Psychological Association, ‘an average 12-year-old has seen 8,000 murders and 100,000 acts of violence on network television’ and this does not go unregistered in young minds. What is happening here is exactly the opposite of the general rule ‘out of sight, out of mind’—‘always in sight, always in mind?’

Health

A joint statement (Jul, 20, 2000) by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP), the American Psychological Association (APA), the American Medical Association (AMA), the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) and the American Psychiatric Association (APA) has associated exposure to media violence with a variety of physical and mental health problems in children and adolescents, including:
Aggressive behavior;

Desensitization to violence;

Fear;

Depression;

Nightmares and;

Sleep disturbances.

We are not talking about a common cold or cough here. These are serious medical conditions, which affect the daily lives of our children. The United States Surgeon General Office, on the issue, has ‘responded by placing the TV Violence controversy in the same context as the smoking and lung cancer controversy – a public health context.

Accessibility

This is the most serious issue at the heart of this growing problem. Although they may not know it, parents are supporting and helping to make Entertainment Violence easily accessible to their children.

What would you do if your child were to be given lessons in the ‘Art of Violence’ to learn how to plan, organize and execute a violent act? Would you:

Think, it’s OK, and forget about it;

Discipline your child;

Talk to the teacher;

Call the appropriate authorities to complain, or;

Continue to pay for lessons.

You certainly wouldn’t consciously pick the last option would you? But you are choosing this option when you continue to allow your children to watch inappropriate content on television and multimedia.

A. Television and Cable

In the United States, 105.44 million households have television (as of Jul, 2002), an estimated 96.7 percent or 98.6 million households are linked to cable (Dec. 2001) and 73.55 million households pay for cable television (as of Jul. 2002).

The National Television Violence Study evaluated almost 10,000 hours of broadcast programming from 1995 through 1997 and found that 61 percent of the programming portrayed interpersonal violence, much of it in an entertaining or glamorized manner. The highest proportion of violence was found in shows aimed at children.

By paying for the cable, which shows our children this violence, we are choosing the last of the above options.

B. Computer and videogames

Around 59 million children – 92 percent of all children between 2 and 17 years old – play video/Internet games according to the national survey by the National Institute on Media and the Family (Dec.13, 2001). The Sixth Annual Video and Computer Game Report Card (2001) states that while the number of high-quality games for children increases, the concern about youth access to inappropriate games also continues to grow. For the first time in several years, it is likely that both the top-selling videogame and the top-selling computer game will carry the M (Mature) rating. Metal Gear Solid 2 (Playstation2) and Return to Castle Wolfenstein (computer) are both on track to be the market leaders.

We are paying dearly for these videogame consoles and CDs.

C. Movies

According to the CMPA’s 1998-99 report, moviegoers who had attended 50 of the top-grossing (most successful) theatrical films released in 1998 would have viewed a total of 2,319 violent incidents, about three-fifths (1,377) of which constituted serious acts of violence. This averages 46 violent acts per film, 28 of them serious. Again, it is parents who pay for their children to visit the movies and witness these scenes.

The truth is undeniable: parents pay for and support violence in multimedia. They pay for the very same media that encourages violent thinking in their children’s vulnerable minds, and they continue to pay as children are inundated with its content. Worse still, they probably started it all by allowing their children to sit in front of the ‘idiot box’, as TV is sometimes known, when they were toddlers. By encouraging this ‘electronic babysitter’, parents stamped their approval on this process of multimedia watching.

Just because in our day we didn’t become violent as a result of exposure to this medium doesn’t mean that our children are safe. The look and feel of today’s multimedia has radically changed over the last 20 or 30 years. We’re not talking black and white images or computerized ping-pong game anymore. Today’s multimedia is life-like virtual reality, in which children can often feel as close to its virtual characters as they do to real human relationships.

Unfortunately, the answer to this problem is not as simple as just hiding the remote, selling the game box, switching off the computer or to stop going to the movies. Our world is more complicated than this.

The problem lies with: 

Our acceptance of media glorifying, glamorizing and trivializing violence;

Our support of such media content;

Our blurred vision of its adverse impact on our children.


Learning Curve

The learning curve is the process we have to navigate in our life; we go through this process of learning everyday from the day we are born.

Babies do not come with a preprogrammed thinking process. Their mind, like a new database, is blank. Over time, the learning process begins as we add…

Read full article. Subscribe to GreatGameIndia Magazine Jan-Mar 2016 Issue

Monday, March 21, 2016

Marx and Satan

Karl Marx, a 33rd Degree Freemason with masonic gesture with secret meaning (right hand in the coat).

"The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world domination by the dissolution of other races...and by the establishment of a world republic in which everywhere the Jews will exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the Children of Israel...will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition..." (Karl Marx in a letter to Baruch Levy, quoted in Review de Paris, June 1, 1928, p. 574)


By Alexei Salapatov 
Published November 1, 1991 

By Georgi Marchenko
Translated by Alexei Salapatov
Edited by Jay Rogers
Published in Predvestnik #2, 1991
Translated January 27, 1997. Quotes from same named book. 

Editor’s note: This article was translated into English from material in a Russian book published under the name “Georgi Marchenko.” It was likely published for distribution during the time of the USSR under a pseudonym. The entire book was published in English as Marx & Satan by Richard Wurmbrand. Readers are encouraged to obtain a copy of this book if they find this article interesting.


The origin of Marxism is within a satanic mystery cult. This is something very few Marxists are aware of. 

Before Marx became a famous economist and communist, he paid his tribute to humanism. Today, one-third of the world is Marxist.* Many in western countries acknowledge Marxism in one form or another. There are even many professing Christians, many of them highly revered, who are convinced that if Christ said many true things about the Kingdom of God, real answers on how to help hungry, poor and oppressed should be sought by reading Marx. 

We’ve heard that Marx was a deep humanitarian; that he was possessed by the idea of helping the oppressed masses. His belief: The reason behind oppression is capitalism. As soon as this putrid system is destroyed after the time of proletariat’s rule, a new society will appear in which everyone will work and receive according to their needs. There will be neither a state that represses individuality, nor war or revolution, but a world-wide brotherhood of nations lasting forever. 

Marx opposed any form of religion since it prevented the fulfillment of his communist ideals – the only answer for all the world’s problems. 

This is the way Marxists explain their position. Yet there are even some Christians who have held similar views. Pastor Ostereier (UK) once preached in a sermon: “Communism, no matter in what form, good or bad as it appears today, is a movement for liberating man from exploitation. We, the members of Christ’s body, humbly repenting should acknowledge that we owe a lot to every communist.” 

I have spent great deal of time and effort studying Marx’s thoughts and I was fortunate to find some things that I’d like to share with my readers. 

In early youth, Marx was a Christian. The first of Marx’s known works was entitled, “Unity of believers in Christ according to the Gospel of John 15:1-14: Unity’s meaning, unconditional necessity, and influence.” Here we find the following words: “Union with Christ is found in a close and living fellowship with Him and in the fact that we always have Him before our eyes and in our hearts. And at the same time that we are possessed by the greatest love of Him, we direct our hearts to our brothers, with whom He bound us closely, and for whom He sacrificed Himself.” 

So Marx was aware of the way in which people may show brotherly love towards each other, that is, through Christianity. 

He continues: “Therefore, unity with Christ internally exalts, comforts in trials, and makes the heart open to love people, not because of our pride or thirst for fame, but because of Christ.” 

At the about the same period of time, he writes in his work entitled: “Thoughts of a young man before choosing a profession”: 

“Religion teaches us the Ideal to Whom we all aspire. He has sacrificed Himself for all mankind. Who will dare to deny such assertions? If we have chosen a profession at which we may give our best to mankind, then we won’t falter under its burden, because it is a sacrifice for all.” 

When he graduated from high school, his diploma contained the following in the category “Religious knowledge”: 

“His knowledge of Christian teachings and principles is clear and properly based. He also knows the history of Christian church to a great extent.” 

Soon after receiving of his diploma, something very mysterious happened. Even before Moses Gess led Marx to socialistic persuasions in 1841, he had become a zealous atheist. This change character could be seen in his later student years. 

In one of his verses, Marx wrote: “I long to take vengeance on the One Who rules from above.” Marx believed that “the One that rules from above” in fact existed. He contended with Him, although God never harmed him. Marx was from a relatively wealthy family. He didn’t starve in his childhood and in his student years he lived much better than his friends. So what caused his fierce hatred towards God? 

Personal motivations are not available to us. Maybe Marx was only somebody’s else speaker in this defiant assertion? 

During this period, the following lines are taken from him from the poem entiled: “Conjuration of falling into despair.” 

I’ll set up my throne above,
Cold and terrible will be the peak of it.
Superstitious trembling is at its base,
Master – most black agony. 

The one who will look with healthy looks,
Will turn away, turn pale and deadly mute.
Possessed by blind and cold deathness,
will prepare a tomb with his happiness. 

The words “I’ll set up my throne” and his confession that agony and fear will go forth from the one who is sitting upon the throne, remind us Lucifer’s proud boast: “I will ascend to heaven, higher than God’s stars I will set up my throne” (Isiah 14:13). 

Why did Marx need such a throne? The answer for this question is in an infamous drama written by Marx in his student years. The drama is called “Oulanem.” There is a mention of a satanic “Black mass,” a ritual conducted by a priest at midnight in which a Bible is burned. All present promise to commit all the seven deadly sins mentioned in the Roman Catholic catechism and to never perform any good works. An orgy follows after that. 

Worship of Satan is very old. In Deuteronomy we read that the Jews “made sacrifices to demons” (32:17). Later, the king of Israel, Jeroboam, set up priests of the high places and of the goats and bulls that he made”(2 Kings 12:25-33). 

The “Oulanem” can be understood if we read with Marx’s bizarre confession made in the verse “Nidler”: 

Hellish evaporations rise and fill my brains,
Until I will go mad and my heart will not change dramatically.
See this sword?
The King of darkness
sold it to me. 

These lines have special meaning when we take into account that during the rituals of higher dedication into a satanic cult, a bewitched sword that guarantees a success is sold to the candidate. He pays for it by signing with his blood taken from his vein the contract which makes his soul belong to Satan after death. 

And now I’ll quote “Oulanem”: 

For he is marking time and giving signs.
Bolder and bolder I play the dance of death.
And they too: Oulanem, Oulanem.
This name sounds like death,
Sounds until won’t stop in miserable shapes.
Halt! Now I have it. It rises from my soul,
Clear as air, hard as my bones.
And still, you personified mankind,
I may take you by the power of my mighty hands and crush with fierce force
In the meantime, as the abyss gapes before me and you in the darkness,
You will fall in it and I’ll follow you,
Laughing and whispering into your ear: “Come down with me, friend!” 

The Holy Scripture, which Marx learned in high school, says that devil was cast down by an angel into the abyss (Rev. 20:3). Marx wanted to send all mankind into this abyss prepared for the devil and his angels. 

Who speaks for Marx in this drama? Is it reasonable to expect this from such a young man – that he would dream that mankind would fall into the abyss (the “outer darkness” as the Bible calls it), and that he himself laughing will follow those who were ensnared by unbelief? Nowhere in the world is this idea cultivated except in the rituals of dedication into the higher degrees of the Satanic church. 

The time to die has come for Oulanem. These are his words: 

Perished, perished. My time is over.
The clock has stopped, the tiny building has fallen.
Soon I’ll squeeze eternity to me, and with a wild cry
Will speak out a curse to all mankind. 

Marx liked to repeat Mephistopheles’ words from Goethe’s “Faust”: “all existing is worthy to be destroyed.” All, including the worker and those who fought for communism in battle. Marx liked to quote these words and Stalin acted according to these words and destroyed even his own family. 

Members of Satan’s cult are not materialists. They believe in life after death. Oulanem, the person whose character Marx assumes, does not deny life after death. But acknowledges it as a life full of hate to the highest degree. I should mention that “eternity” means “torture” to demons. This is the reason why demons rebuked Jesus: “And so they cried out: what do you have to do with us, Jesus, Son of God? Have you come to torture us before our time” (Matt. 8:29). 

Marx says the same thing: 

Hah, eternity, our eternal pain,
Indescribable, unmeasurable death!
Disgusting, artificially conceived,
To despise us – We, who ourselves, as a clock mechanism
Blindly mechanical, created to be
Foolish calendars of time and space,
Without any purpose,
Besides accidental appearance for destruction. 

We begin to realize what happened to young Marx. He used to have Christian ideals, but he didn’t applying them to his life. His correspondence with his father testifies of spending of large amounts of money for entertainment that caused endless conflicts with his parents. In this situation, he possibly was entangled in the snare of a secret Satanic cult and went through the ritual of dedication. Satan is seen by his followers in hallucinations during the orgies and speaks through their mouths. Marx is just Satan’s voice when he proclaims “I want to take vengeance on the One who is above.” 

Let’s go to the end of “Oulanem” drama: 

Hah! Tortured on the burning wheel,
I must happily dance in the circle of eternity:
If there would be anything beyond it,
I’d jump into it, even if I had to destroy the world for it. 

Build between it and me!
It must be destroyed with curses.
I’ll supress stubborn existence by my hands.
Embracing me, it should calmly fade out.
And then – down to nowhere.
Completely disappear, and not to be – that would be – the life. 

In the “Oulanem” drama Marx, in fact, does the same thing as the devil. He curses all humanity. 

“Oulanem” is probably the only drama in the world in which all the players are so sure of their sinfulness and revel in it as on a holiday. There is neither white nor black, neither Claudio and Ophelia, Iago and Desdemona. Everything is black in it, and every one appeared to have Mephistopheles’ character. All of it’s players are demonic and doomed to perish. 

When Marx was writing “Oulanem,” the young genius was 18. His plan for his life was very clear by that time. He had no illusions about serving mankind, the proletariat or socialism. He wanted to destroy the world, set up a throne for himself that would be based upon the world’s shocks, throes and convulsions. 

At this stage, Marx’s views were developing. Some mysterious things appear in his correspondence with his father. For instance, the son writes: “The cover has fallen, my Holy of Holies was emptied and there was a need to put new gods there.” This was written on November 10, 1837 by the young fellow who previously professed to be a Christian. He used to profess that Christ inhabited in his heart. Suddenly this turned upside-down. What new gods replaced Christ’s place? 

Marx’s father replied (February 10, 1838): “I didn’t demand any explanations about such a mysterious thing, though it seems to be very controversial.” What was that mysterious thing? No biographer has been able to explain these puzzling words. 

What suddenly caused young Marx’s father to express anxiety for controversial influences on his young son? 

In a poem, Karl Marx wrote: 

I have lost heaven,
And know that for sure.
My soul, once faithful to God,
Now is destined for hell. 

We need not comment. 

Marx began with proud ambitions in art. His verse and drama were important for the discovery of his inner world, but because of the absence of poetic talent, they remained useless. Failures in painting and architecture gave us Hitler; in drama – Goebels; in philosophy – Rosenberg. 

Marx was the implacable enemy of all gods, a man who bought a sword from the prince of darkness for the price of his own soul.

Did Marx really buy a sword from Satan? 

His daughter, Eleonora, wrote book entitled: “The Moor and the general – memoirs of Marx and Engels.” She says that Karl told many stories to her and his other daughter when they were children. Her favorite story was about some one named Hans Rekle. This story was continued for months and seemed to never end. Hans Rekle was a wizard who had a toy shop and a lot of debts. Though he was wizard, he constantly was in need of money. Therefore, in spite of his desire, he had to sell all his cute toys one by one to the devil. Eleonora wrote that some of these adventures were so awful that her hair stood on end. 

Robert Payne, in his book “Marx,” also tells in detail, from Eleonora’s words, how the poor wizard Rekle unwillingly was selling his toys keeping them until the very last moment. But because he had an agreement with devil, he was unable to escape. 

The biographer comments: “Scarely can we doubt that those never ending stories were autobiographic. Sometimes it seemed as though he was realizing that he was performing the devil’s duty.” Marx didn’t conceive of socialism when was finishing “Oulanem” and other early works in which he admits he made a pact with Satan. 

At that time Marx met Moses Gess, the man who played most significant role in his life and led Marx to accept socialistic ideals. 

In a letter to B. Auerbasch (1841), Gess characterized Marx as “the greatest, possibly the only, philosopher of today … Dr. Marx is very young (24 years old at the most); he’ll strike the final blow on religion and philosophy.” So the first target was to strike a blow to religion not socialism. 

It is a myth that Marx had been pursuing the ideal of helping mankind, that religion was the obstacle on the way to the realization of those ideals, and that this was the reason why he took an anti-religious position. On the contrary, Marx hated all gods and couldn’t hear about God. Socialism was only a decoy to attract the proletariat and intelligensia to the realization of a satanic ideal. 

Marx publicly spoke about metaphysics very little, but we can gather information about his views from those with whom he communicated. One of his co-members in the First International was Mikhail Bakunin – a Russian anarchist who wrote that the devil was the first free thinker and the world savior; that the devil liberated Adam and sealed his face with the seal of humanism making him disobedient. 

Bakunin not only glorified Lucifer, but had a concrete program of revolution – but not the kind that is able to free the poor from oppression. He wrote: “In this revolution, we’ll have to wake up the devil in people in order to stir up their lowest passions.” 

Here it is very important to give special signicficance to the fact that Marx and his friends, being against God, were not atheists as modern Marxists call themselves. Although they denied God publicly, they hated the One Whose existence they never doubted. 

All active Satanists have a disorderly personal life, Marx was no exception. Arnold Kunzli, in his book, “Marx – Psychography,” wrote that Marx was guilty of causing the suicide of two of his daughters and one son-in-law. His daughter Laura also buried three of her own children and then committed suicide together with her husband. 

Marx had lost a lot of money on the exchange. Being a brilliant economist, he nevertheless could only loose money. 

Since everything in a satanic cult is covered by secrecy, we only have a suspicion that Marx had ties to the cult. His slovenly life could be one more in the chain of evidence. 

Marx was a highly intelligent person, as was Engels, however their correspondence full of indecencies which are unusual for men of their social position. A lot of obscene words, but never do we read of these idealists communicating their humanistic or socialistic dreams. 

Everything in Marx’ behavior had a demonic character. His friend Weitling wrote: “Usual topics for conversation with Marx are atheism, the guillotine, Hegel, rope and knife.” Being a Jew himself, he wrote an anti-semetic book called, “The Jewish Question.” He hated not only Jews. He hated Germans and asserted that “only a stick can raise a German.” He use to talk about “the dumb German nation” and the fact that “German, Chinese and Jewish people can be compared to the street vendors.” Finally, he makes mentions of “the disgusting national narrow-mindedness of Germans” (A. Kunzli “Marx – Psychography”). He counted Russians as a people of the lowest sort, “a barbarian race,” and called Slavics – “ethnic garbage.” 

So we have paid some attention to several inclinations that allow us to believe that Marx may well have been a Satanist. 

Here is one more interesting fact. Captain Reese, a disciple of Marx, grieved by the news of his death, went to London to visit the house where his beloved teacher once lived. The Marx family had already left the home and he was only able to talk to the servant who lived in the same house. He heard the following amazing words about Marx from her: “He was a man with the fear of God. When he was very ill, he used to pray alone in his room before burning candles, wound round his head was something like tape.” This reminds philacteries used by the Jews during their morning prayers. But Marx was baptized in a Christian church. He never confessed Judaism and later became an enemy of God. He had been writing books against religion and had brought up all his children to be atheists. So what was that ceremony which the uneducated servant understood to be a prayer? Praying Jews with phylacteries on their face never place a row of candles before them. Could it have been some sort of a satanic ritual? 

Another possible hint is in a letter to Marx from his son Edgar, dated March 21, 1854. It begins with these astonishing words, “My Dear Devil.” Where else does a son greet his father in such a ridiculous way? But Satanists write so to the ones they love. Was his son involved too? 

One more significant fact, Marx wife wrote to him in August of 1844: “Your last pastoral letter, Higher Priest and soul Possessor, brought peace and calmness to your poor flock.” 

Marx clearly expressed his dream concerning the elimination of all religions in “Communist Manifesto.” We should assume satanic cults were included here too. But his wife addresses him as a Higher Priest. But of what religion? The only faith confessed in Europe where a Higher Priest is present is Satanism. So what kind of pastoral letters could a man write who was known as an atheist? Where are those letters? These are periods of Marx’s life that remain unexplored. 

Marx died in desperation, as all Satanists die. He wrote to Engels on March 25, 1883, “How purposeless and empty life is, but how desired!”

The Cult of Lenin 

Marxism hides a mystery that very few Marxists are aware of. Yet Lenin wrote a half century later that none of the Marxists comprehended Marx. 

There is a mystery in Lenin’s life too. Here is what he wrote about the Soviet state: “The State is in our hands. And did it act this year according to the new economic policy as we desired? No, it didn’t. We don’t want to admit the following: it acted not as we desired. So how did it act? The machine jumped out of our hands: as if another person controlled it, and the machine didn’t go to the place where we directed it, but went to the place where that someone else dictated.” 

What were those mysterious forces that overcame the plans of former Bolshevik’s leaders? They gave life to a force, hoping to control it, but it appeared to be more terrible than they expected. What made them desperate? 

I do not pretend that I have found perfect evidence of Marx’s membership in a Satanic cult. But I believe there is a lot of information that points us to such a conclusion. 

Again: I realize, the information given here by myself is far from perfect. This question has to be researched in details by someone else. However, from what is written here, we may conclude – that the Marx described by Marxists is nothing more than a myth. 

The Marx who loves all people is a myth created after his death. 

Darwin’s book made Marx really happy. In his opinion, it was one more blow that forced man to forget his Godly origin and his great destiny. Darwin said that a man evolved from the ape and has no other purpose but to survive. 

Satan was not able to pull down God’s throne. Therefore, he made men valueless. Man was represented as a slave of his stomach and a descendant of an animal. 

Later Freud continued the work of those two satanic giants, reducing human beings to base sexual instincts which sometimes give rise to politics, art and religion. 

Some more before I finish. I have saved most important for the end. 

Jesus spoke to the church at Pergamos some peculiar words: “I know your works, and where you dwell, where Satan’s throne is” (Rev. 2,13). Evidently, Pergamos was the center of a satanic cult in ancient times. A famous tourist book by Bedecker mentions, in a section dedicated to Berlin, that since 1944, the Altar of Pergamos was placed in one of Berlin’s museums after it was excavated by German archeologists. 

But this is not the end of the Satanic altar story. The Swedish paper “Svenska Dagbladet” reported the following on January 27, 1948: 

1. After capturing Berlin, the Soviet Army removed the original Satanic altar to Moscow. (Strange, but for a long time the altar was not shown in any Soviet museum. Why it was necessary to remove it to Moscow? I mentioned earlier that some higher leaders of the Soviet hierarchy practiced satanic rituals. Possibly they wanted to keep the altar of Pergamos for their personal usage? There are many dark spots here. Even fragments of such precious archeological rarities don’t disappear.) 

2. Architect Schusev, who built Lenin’s tomb, took the Pergamos altar as the project prototype. This was in 1924. It’s a known fact that Schusev received all the needed information from Frederic Paulsen – an acknowledged authority in archeology. 

Satan’s altar of Pergamos was only one of a kind. Why did Christ point to it? Perhaps because it was to play a leading role. His words were prophetic.


Endnote from the translator – Lenin’s tomb is still standing today in the very center of Moscow, Red Square, containing the dead body of the person who made the most terrible and costly revolution and civil war in our history. Despite the number of proposals to bury the body, it remains at the same location many years after the Soviet Union’s collapse. 

This book, Karl Marx, was written by a Christian dissident at the time of the Soviet Union.

Sunday, March 20, 2016

The Film That Will Change the Face of the 2016 Election; “Eagle One to Wanta”


March 16, 2016

This movie will contain information that will change US History forever and help us all set a new course back to regaining our Republic.

After serious interception efforts have been overcome and despite overwhelming odds against it, the expected movie on Lee Wanta’s true story, Eagle One to Wanta, is now well under way and planned for release sometime this summer before the upcoming Presidential Election.

For Immediate Release: Gibby Media Group, Inc. has released a 10 minute preview of the upcoming documentary film “ Eagle One to Wanta”. The exclusive feature film documentary will be released in the summer of 2016 prior to the national elections.

The exclusive film documentary contains never before revealed content from interviews with Ambassador Lee Wanta who was President Reagan’s mandated secret agent. Lee Wanta worked as a private citizen under the Totten Doctrine behind enemy lines to help destabilize and bankrupt the Soviet Union and to end the cold war.

Lee Wanta is known as President Reagan’s junkyard dog and the 31.2 trillion dollar man for the private funds he secured in the process of performing under his presidential mandate.

The preview makes public for the first time some classified information that is now declassified and has been opened to the public for the first time providing new historical information.

The exclusive story of how the Soviet Union was destabilized, bankrupted and the cold war was ended without firing a shot under President Reagan’s leadership.

In a face to face meeting with Lee Wanta at the Kremlin, President & Secretary General of the Soviet Union, Mikail Gorbachov mutually agrees to step down from his position for 10 billion dollars which Lee promptly paid him. The events are recreated and explained in detail in the finished documentary.

The new Russian Federation was born from this historic meeting.

Exactly how Lee Wanta made his 31.2 trillion dollar fortune and what he intends to do to help our great nation and other nation states throughout the world.

How Lee Wanta’s personal funds were stolen/ converted by politicians and the Federal Reserve System. The origin of the Federal Reserve and its foreign ownership explained.

Reveals why Kennedy was assassinated for his work to close the Federal Reserve and printing new United States notes. Two attempts on Reagan’s life explored.

Explanation of who the Puppet masters are and how they directly control the world economies, the military industrial complex and intelligence community.

Deputy White House counsel Vince Foster receives 250 million dollars from Ambassador Lee Wanta in Switzerland as a donation to Hillary Clinton’s Children’s Defense Fund. Vince Foster allegedly commits suicide 10 days later. Why haven’t the Clintons accounted for these funds they received?

Re-creation of Lee’s false arrest in Switzerland, his torture and attempted murder in a Swiss dungeon and later in Wisconsin.

Lee Wanta’s imprisonment and unlawful kangaroo court in Dane County Court in Wisconsin. How the Corporate State of Wisconsin operates, revealing corruption and criminal activity at every level of government direct violations of Title 18.U.S.C. Sections 201, 371,241, 242, RICO.

President Reagan’s efforts to disband the CIA and his dangerous relationship with his then Vice President, George H. W. Bush, former CIA Director.

This 10 minute documentary preview follows-up on the recent worldwide release of the biography, Wanta ! Black Swan, White Hat, by Viking International; on Amazon, Barnes and Noble and Apple Ibooks.

10 minute Preview video https://vimeo.com/158213524

Veterans Today articles on Lee Wanta:













Related Posts:





Lal Salaam To Comrade Krishna


March 19, 2016 

In pre-poll Bengal and Kerala, vote-catching reds turn religious.

Karl Marx once remarked that he had found the German philosopher Hegel standing on his head and turned him the right side up in formulating his own theory of dialectical materialism. Now, Indian communists in Bengal and Kerala seem to be upending the author of Das Kapital, at least in so far as it concerns his dismissal of religion as the opiate of the masses. 


As the two states gear up for assembly polls, the followers of Marx are resorting to what might be termed diametrical immaterialism by turning to religion, which they seem to reinterpret not as a mass narcotic but as an invigorating Viagra of the vote bank. In both the states the comrades are trying to woo voters by giving an approving thumbs-up to religious rites and places of worship.

In Bengal, big guns from the communist arsenal have reportedly made themselves conspicuous by their presence at Hooghly's Furfura Sharif, the 14th century shrine revered by the Muslim community, which is widely seen to be a pivotal poll factor in no less than 123 of the state's 294 constituencies.

Asked to explain how such devotional genuflexions can be reconciled to atheistic Marxism, the CPM state secretary is quoted as saying that while he does not practise religious worship either in private or in public, he does visit the shrine in question as, being the venue of a popular fair, “It provides a good opportunity to connect with people.“

Some might feel that the leftist doth protest too much, even as his comrades in arms ­ or should that be comrades in alms? ­In distant Kerala, cross over to the saffron side of the religious spectrum and seek to win over the Hindu vote in the face of a growing BJP challenge.

Key functionaries of the CPM have been spotted joining in festivities associated with Hindu deities like Krishna, though such revisionist deviations have been explained away as having not religious but secular associations in that they represent the `end of Onam', the harvest festival.

Some might deem such excuses to be unnecessary in that its acolytes have turned Marxism itself into a religion, replete with its holy icons like Lenin and Trotsky, apart from Karl himself, and its priestly class as represented by the Politburo.

Atheists might suggest that, like other faiths, communism banks on pie in the sky rewards, and cite the story of Chinese farmers who were exhorted to sow crops while reciting the thoughts of Chairman Mao in order to ensure a bumper harvest. Asked by a Red Guard if he'd done as prescribed, a turnip farmer replied that he had and that his crop reached from earth to heaven. “Don't you know there's no heaven?“ asked the Red Guard. “Yes“, said the peasant. “And there are no turnips either.“

Instead of turnips in China, read votes in Bengal and Kerala to get the moral of the story.


Friday, March 18, 2016

Dangerous Games


March 18, 2016 

Liberty takes a hit when lawmakers obsess over who eats beef or chants 'Bharat mata ki jai'.

Two recent incidents strengthen a worrisome sense that in India today not only is the space for liberal values shrinking but rule of law is also being subverted. First, four Kashmiri students at Rajasthan's Mewar University were assaulted by a mob and arrested over allegations of consuming beef in their hostel room. Members of right-wing groups gathered outside the campus, threw stones and blocked the Ajmer-Udaipur highway. A mob also set fire to a shop that reportedly supplied meat to the Kashmiri students. 

However, preliminary investigation by authorities shows that the meat in question wasn't beef. This makes the Mewar University case disconcertingly similar to the Dadri incident last year where Mohammad Akhlaq was lynched over rumours that he had consumed beef. That it's become so easy to accuse someone of eating beef and then let loose mob violence is alarming. 

Whether it is the BJP-led government at the Centre or some of the party's state governments, their obsession with the beef issue is to blame. A dangerous attempt has been made to equate proscription of beef with a Hindu majoritarian nationalist identity. 

Such messaging from the top political leadership has encouraged mob rule and imperilled law and order. 

We see a similar pattern in the suspension of AIMIM MLA Waris Pathan from the Maharashtra assembly for refusing to chant, 'Bharat mata ki jai'. Though nobody should be forced to chant the slogan, it is being projected as a test of one's patriotism. Such messaging is also dangerous. It's noteworthy that Waris's suspension was vigorously supported by Congress and NCP too ­ suggesting how other parties are jumping on to the nationalist bandwagon alongside BJP. And this in turn will egg on conservative minority politics by parties such as AIMIM, leading to a dangerous polarisation. 

By pushing a narrow definition of nationalism BJP lawmakers are not only playing with fire but also doing a huge disservice to the idea of India. In a country as vast and diverse as ours, a single slogan or dietary preference can't be the marker of one's patriotism. Our Constitution was drafted precisely with a view to accommodating multiple ideas of identity and autonomy of opinion. That's what our legislators should be upholding. Instead of vitiating the atmosphere by debating who is a nationalist and who isn't, legislators should focus on substantive development issues. That would be truly patriotic. 

Bring Down Corporatocracy


MARCH 18, 2016

On December 6th, 2011, Los Angeles became the first major U.S. city to call for an amendment reserving Constitutional rights solely for living human beings.

“Politicians and policemen love to use the phrase “rule of law” when they argue for their positions on certain issues such as criminality and economics.

Ordained by God, the Rule of Law is supreme and it should be the binding force that unites civilized men, we all are.

The problem is, rule of law does not always mean social justice.

Most of the time, the rule of law only masks the tyranny out of the moneyed class for they have the monopoly to hire “experts of the law” to defend them in times of aggression, i.e. their own aggression against the poor.

Therefore, in the end, the rule of law only favors tyranny and oppression, it is a sheer delusion to think otherwise.

The rule of law that we are subjected to is called commercial law, the Uniform Commercial Code, that kind of rule set which gives the semblance and color of law, i.e. those rules and statutes crafted by our representatives without our full approval.”


Under this representative government which provides the illusion of freedom and self-determination, through the deception that the rule of the majority equates wisdom even when that same majority are held in abject ignorance by the Few, our collective advancement is effectively retarded.

The pyramid of control that they made immune from the same rule of law that they had formulated is proof enough that the whole game is rigged to the core.


There is so much in store for humanity once those self-appointed rulers of the planet are brought down from power. We all have to take actions anywhere we can.

Corporations are not humans, and those who are behind corporate crimes must be brought down hard.

The action shown above must be replicated worldwide, and Corporate Agents of the Crown lurking in government must all be removed.

Corporatocracy is socially corrosive and downright obsolete, only slaves need to participate in it.

If possible, the very foundation of corporatocracy that is the Satanic Vatican Church of Lucifer must be burned down to the ground so that true spirituality will rise again.

These Adivasi Women Are Eliminating the Practice of Witch Hunting


March 17, 2016

Fifty-five hundred tribal women from 100 villages in Gujarat came together to fight several social evils like witch hunting, using folk forms – dance, theatre and singing – to spread awareness about these issues.

The Panchmahaals district of Gujarat is predominantly tribal. History tells us that in the 18th century this region was occupied by the Mughals but was later conquered by General Scindia, a Maratha. The Scindias then became the Maharajas of Gwalior. But after 1818, the Scindias were forced to recognize British sovereignty. And in 1861, Panchmahaals was transferred to the British by the Scindias.

In 2006, the Ministry of Panchayati Raj declared Panchamahaals as one of 250 most backward districts of India.

Crowd at the Adivasi Kalakar Tukdi performance on Feb 15, at Gajapura, Devgadh Baria.

The land here is rocky, undulating and not very fertile. Land holdings are extremely small. Agriculture is primarily rain-fed and maize is the staple crop. But, due to small land holdings, it is very common for adivasis to migrate out in search of work as agricultural labour or labour at construction sites in the nearby cities.

The 2011 census showed that the literacy rate is 70.99%, but the ground reality seems different altogether.

Socially, women here have not been allowed to own or exercise their rights over property or land. The practice of ‘witch hunting’ is very common. Health services are meagre, irregular or absent, forcing the population into the hands of private practitioners or quacks with ever increasing out-of-pocket expenses. The public distribution system is corrupt. Conflicts with the forest department have increased.

The Devgadh Mahila Sangathan, an informal organization, began understanding and tackling some of these issues some time ago – especially the ones impacting women from socio-economically marginalised groups. But the members soon realised their strategy of speaking to people about these issues was not translating into action. They found it difficult to hold the interest of the community in understanding and dealing with the problems facing them.

However, the adivasi women leaders quickly saw that performing troupes from outside the area, which sometimes visited their region, were able to create an impact.

A performance to create awareness about violence against women

Primarily, these groups were able to hold the interest and attention of the communities and engage them in a dialogue – the method, if used strategically, would lead to action.

This led to the birth of the performing team – the Adivasi Kalakar Tukdi – under the Devgadh Mahila Sangathan. Simple, normal, shy tribal women, slowly but surely, transformed themselves into performers, adding a new skill to their repertoire.

Today this Adivasi Kalakar Tukdi has nine performers, who understand the nitty-gritty of an issue, write their scripts, act, sing, dance, provide music and later, after the performance, engage the community in a discussion about the problem and problem solving strategies, as well as counsel and support the community to take action.

The performers say that “dramas and songs help set up dialogues with the community and, therefore, change is inevitable.” The Adivasi Kalakar Tukdi has, over the years, addressed some very difficult problems through its performances, going from village to village performing, engaging, counselling and supporting the community.

The dramas and songs have helped the Adivasi Kalakar Tukdi to reach out to a large audience. The performers have meetings, focus on relevant issues and gather field insights. They then script, pen songs, add music, review, and subsequently chalk out a plan for the performances.
One extremely vicious and cruel practice the group encountered is ‘witch hunting.’

A bhuva telling a woman she is a witch, in a performance by Adivasi Kalakar Tukdi

Many a times, families want to eliminate women who are either widowed or single, in order to get their hands on the property or money bequeathed to them. Local quacks, known as bhuvas, are roped in. The bhuva is respected and feared. He may create a link between the death of a person and the widow/single woman by saying, “so and so person died because this woman is a witch.” This kind of talk spreads quickly and families conspire to get rid of the accused women.

The Devgadh Mahila Sangathan, through its Adivasi Kalakar Tukdi, started to reveal how women were declared witches in order to grab their land, homes and money. The performances were powerful. Many in the audience cried while watching – because they had experienced something similar in their families. These performances also got huge media attention.

The bhuvas now run scared of the Devgadh Mahila Sangathan’s relentless awareness building efforts and they are afraid of police action.

A performance shows how bhuvas perform rituals

The local media supports the Sangathan too. The police departments in Panchmahaals and Dahod have roped in Adivasi Kalakar Tukdi to perform in other districts and educate the communities there.

There are other important issues that need to be taken up – food security, health, lack of or poor implementation of government schemes, education, violence, the partisan role of the panch (a local body that settles disputes and other issues), forests and the rights of the tribals, and elections and the election process.

The Adivasi Kalakar Tukdi has 1000 plus performances under its belt.

The lead narrator at a performance

The drama on ‘witch hunting’ has seen 100 plus performances. At a district level function, the Adivasi Kalakar Tukdi put up a performance about how tribals are exploited because they lack literacy skills. The District Collector and other senior officials were present. The former was pained and asked the Kalakar Tukdi to stop the performance. The performers asked the District Collector that if the Kalakar Tukdi stopped singing was the situation on the ground going to change?

Similarly, post a performance on the forest and the rights of the tribals, two tribal women were badly beaten up by a forest guard who was drunk. He hit them because the women were grazing their goats in the forest. As a result, one of the women had a broken hand. Over the next 10 days, the Devgadh Mahila Sangathan came together to help the woman. The members first ensured she got proper medical care. Then they wrote to and called upon concerned forest officials to resolve this issue. But none of the officials responded.

Next, the women members – around 300 of them – reached Devgadh Bariya and gheraoed the forest office. They then had a ‘sit in’ at the forest office. They made sure all the officials were at their tables and then surrounded them, refusing to let them exit the building. The fans and the lights were shut off. No one moved out. The officials were at their tables while the women sat on the floor. This ‘sit in’ went on from 11 am till 9.30 pm. Finally, the guard was brought in, he apologised and said he would never behave violently again. After two days, the Range Forest Officer called the Devgadh Mahila Sangathan and said that many of his officials were ill due to the trauma of the ‘sit in’ and he was going to file a police complaint. The women from Devgadh Mahila Sangathan asked him to go ahead. However, no complaint was lodged.

Recently, the Kalakar Tukdi performers learnt a new skill – puppetry. They plan to interweave this form into their performances to make them more interesting.

The work of the Devgadh Mahila Sangathan and Kalakar Tukdi is supported by ANANDI, Area Networking and Development Initiatives, which has been working with over 10000 rural poor women from four districts of Gujarat since 1995. Forming women’s collectives and working towards changing the nature and direction of systemic forces that marginalize women has been an integral component of ANANDI’s work in Gujarat.