In A Time Of Universal Deceit, Telling The Truth Becomes A Revolutionary Act. (Orwell)




Search This Blog

Blog Archive

Showing posts with label 26/11. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 26/11. Show all posts

Sunday, November 26, 2017

26/11 Mumbai attack was a joint IB-CIA-Mossad-RSS project

Indian writer Amaresh Misra has written a powerful exposée entitled “Headley saga: Mumbai attack was a joint IB-CIA-Mossad-RSS project”, The Milligazette:,”

Amaresh Misra is an outstanding Indian historian and writer and the author of the important books "War of Civilizations: India AD 1857"–Volume I-The Road to Delhi & Volume II- The Long Revolution (see:

In these books (launched by the Indian Vice President on March 2008) Amaresh Misra describes how the British state terrorist deliberately murdered 10 million Indians as reprisals for 2,000 British dead in the 1857 Rebellion (see War of Civilizations: India AD 1857"–Volume I-The Road to Delhi & Volume II- The Long Revolution:

Analysis of Motive, Opportunity and Means (MOM) had already shown the US CIA, Israeli Mossad and indigenous Indian terrorists as the likely culprits of the 26/11 and 11/7 (7/11) Mumbai atrocities (see "2008 Mumbai Atrocity. US, UK, Israeli, Muslim or Hindu crime?": and "Mumbai 7/11 atrocity. Israeli, US or Indigenous Crime?":

Indeed MOM plus University of Copenhagen scientific analyses revealing unexploded nanothermite high explosive in all WTC dust samples studied indicates US complicity in 9/11 (and accordingly very likely Israeli involvement in this atrocity against Americans) (see "Scientific facts on 9/11 point at US. Obama accessory after the fact of 9-11":

According to Amaresh Misra: “With the row over India getting access to [terrorist] David Headley growing acrimonious each day, the CIA's double agent saga seems all set to open up a can of incredible worms. First, the case unmasks the pro-US face of the Indian English media. When the Headley saga first came to light, Vir Sanghavi of the Hindustan Times carried an editorial piece claiming that if 'Headley is CIA, and knew about 26/11, the CIA knew about the attack.' In other words, Sanghavi accepted the 'conspiracy theory'–which in the eyes of the English media was 'peddled' by Aziz Burney and this author during the terrible aftermath of 26/11–that the event was a CIA/Mossad/RSS/ISI plot. In November-December 2008, Vir Sanghavi and his cohorts in the English media attacked both Aziz Burney and this author for spelling forth the 'conspiracy theory'. Then after Headley's name surfaced, they changed tune, without of course admitting their debt to Mr. Burney or this author… This highlights the second point, that basically Headley and the CIA cannot be de-linked. Thank God the government of India put into place the NIA, a new National Investigative Agency. The NIA was set up, as the IB and other Indian agencies, especially the IB, had not only gone anti-Muslim-they had gone anti-India” (see Amaresh Misra. “Headley saga: Mumbai attack was a joint IB-CIA-Mossad-RSS project”, The Milligazette:

The Indian Government has become closely linked through intelligence, military purchases, corruption, and state terrorism against Indians to the anti-Asian, anti-African, anti-Indian, race-based, genocidal, racist Zionist-run nuclear terrorist state of Apartheid Israel.

Remember that Apartheid Israel , together with the US, UK and Apartheid Australia, supported the racist regime of Apartheid South Africa that obscenely deprived Indians as well as Africans and part-Europeans of their fundamental human rights.

Indeed the Israeli hatred of Asians, Indians, Africans and non-Europeans was so great that racist Zionists helped Apartheid Israel develop nuclear weapons to protect Apartheid South Africa from ‘one-man-one-vote” (see “South Africa and weapons of mass destrcution”: The US-, UK- and Apartheid Australia-supported genocidal Israelis are estimated to have as many as 400 nuclear weapons to back their race-based, genocidal colonization of the Arab world (see “Israel and weapons of mass destruction”: and “List of states with nuclear weapons”:

Jewish Israeli Professor Avi Shlaim is Professor of International Relations at prestigious Oxford University, UK ,and the author of “The Iron Wall: Israel and the Arab World” and of “Lion of Jordan: King Hussein's Life in War and Peace” (for biographical details of this eminent Jewish scholar see Wikipedia: This is what this outstanding Jewish Israeli scholar has had to say about nuclear terrorist rogue state if Apartheid Israel: “The only way to make sense of Israel's senseless war in Gaza is through understanding the historical context. Establishing the state of Israel in May 1948 involved a monumental injustice to the Palestinians … This brief review of Israel's record over the past four decades makes it difficult to resist the conclusion that it has become a rogue state with "an utterly unscrupulous set of leaders". A rogue state habitually violates international law, possesses weapons of mass destruction and practises terrorism - the use of violence against civilians for political purposes. Israel fulfils all of these three criteria; the cap fits and it must wear it. Israel's real aim is not peaceful coexistence with its Palestinian neighbours but military domination. It keeps compounding the mistakes of the past with new and more disastrous ones. Politicians, like everyone else, are of course free to repeat the lies and mistakes of the past. But it is not mandatory to do so” (see Avi Shlaim, “How Israel brought Gaza to the brink of humanitarian catastrophe”, Guardian, 7 January 2009:

What can decent Indians do about Indian complicity in criminal, racist US state terrorism and Israeli state terrorism against fellow Indians?

Peace is the only way but silence kills and silence is complicity. Decent Indians are obliged to (a) inform everyone they can about US state terrorist and Israeli state terrorist attacks on Indians, and (b) demand Sanctions and Boycotts against Apartheid Israel and its supporters, notably the USA (aka the United States of Israel), the UK and Apartheid Australia (as were successfully applied to US-, UK- , Apartheid Israel- and Apartheid Australia-supported, anti-Indian racist regime of Apartheid South Africa).


Mumbai and the Anglo-American-Mossad-RSS Nexus

False Flag Operations In India Named As Terrorism Sponsored By MOSSAD-CIA

German Fascist Links To Islamists

The Rise Of Hindutva Terrorism

Government behind Parliament attack and 26/11

US-ISREAL Double Agent Involved In Mumbai Terror Attack, Caught Preparing False flag Operation in Danemark

Thursday, April 28, 2016

26/11 – What Really Happened At Nariman Chabad House

The 26/11 Mumbai Attacks of 2008 was as we have reported earlier were a sequel to Spanish Train Bombings which were coordinated with such sophistication where 2 parallel and distinct operations were carried out.

The attack on Taj, Oberoi, Trident, Leopold and Nariman House along the seashore.

The attack at Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus (CST), Cama Hospital and Rangbhavan Lane in the heart of the city.

The two targets, the ATS Chief Hemant Karkare and the three buildings that were selected, are diagonally opposite in nature and texture. The former is definitely not in favour of either the underworld or the foreign intelligence agencies that want to penetrate into India using the cover of rightwing militant organizations. The latter mentioned targets, Taj and Oberoi hosted ‘distinguished guests’ during the last week of November 2008. Most of them were Diamond Merchants and coordinators of intelligence in South Asia.

Here is an exhaustive account of what really happened at the Nariman House, a centre for disseminating traditional Judaism by the Chabad movement also known as Chabad House, pieced together from facts reported in multiple mainstream news media outlets during the time but largely ignored during investigation and analysis.


Sunday, December 6, 2015


What happens in terms of creating wars is a mind-manipulation technique called "Problem-Reaction-Solution"... and it works like this: Let's say you want to centralize power into fewer and fewer hands through the UN or NATO.

If you did that openly and said,

"This is what we want to do", there'd be a reaction against that.

People would say,

"Hey, this is a fascist state you want to create. Were not having this."

But through this technique of Problem-Reaction-Solution, you can actually manipulate people to demand you do what you want to do anyway.

So it works like this: First of all you create the problem, but you get someone else to be blamed for it. You then report that problem through the media in the way you want it reported - because the media is owned by the same people who own the banks, etc.

You get the public to react to your problem by saying,

"Something must be done; this can't go on; what are THEY going to do about it?".

And at that point, THEY, who have covertly created the problem and blamed someone else, who gleaned that reaction of "Do Something", then offer the solution to the problems they have created.

So if you take the world wars for example - after the first world war, which the financial centers of London and Wall Street, etc, funded all sides, power on this planet was in fewer hands than ever before (via the League of Nations). After the second world war, it was even fewer hands on the wheels of power.

And as a result of the second world war, we had the creation of the United Nations and NATO; and we had this great centralization of global power.

-David Icke

This "Problem-Reaction-Solution" technique is not just used to create and control wars, it can also be applied to any situation where you want to produce a particular outcome.

For example, this technique is currently being used to centralize power in the financial world. It can also be used to introduce new laws that restrict our civil liberties.

So, whenever you see some big news story - whether it be an alleged terrorist attack, a run on a currency, the accidental loss of people's data, or an allegation that some poor country has developed nuclear weapons - the first question you need to ask yourself is this:
"Who benefits from me believing this information?"

Friday, November 27, 2015

Evidence of Fraud in the War on Terror

"The United States and its allies had been deliberately proliferating radical Islam for decades, only to later spend trillions fighting the enemy they created, thus generating huge war profits for Wall Street moguls."

Dear friends,

Is the War on Terror a fraud? Have you noticed that when the government declares a war on something, it tends to get worse and not better? President Nixon declared war on drugs in the early 70s, yet since then the number of people incarcerated for drug crimes has risen dramatically. And since President G.W. Bush declared war on terror after 9/11, terrorism has grown and spread worldwide.

Is there a deeper agenda behind all of this? Is it possible that covert groups are manipulating the War on Terror to create more war, knowing that this helps to fill the coffers of the multinationals and those who benefit from them? A highly decorated U.S. general who discovered how he had been manipulated went so far as to write a book titled "War is a Racket." Another U.S. general stated, "we helped build ISIS."

The essay below uses easily verified facts to show many ways in which the War on Terror is a fraud. This brilliant article connects the dots on the War on Terror in a way that our major media have sadly failed us. Even the beginning photo of President Reagan in 1985 meeting with members of the Mujahideen in the White House reveals blatant war profiteering. Explore what is written here and verify the links given to prove that things are not always as they seem.

This essay is taken from the incredibly profound online book Lifting the Veil, which uses highly reliable sources to reveal countless political and economic manipulations carried out in secret worldwide by powerful, well-hidden groups for decades. By educating ourselves and shining light into these shadows, we can create powerful change that will transform our lives and world for the better. Thanks for caring. Please spread the word and don't miss our "What you can do" section.

With best wishes for a transformed world,

Note: Lifting the Veil by Timothy Silver is available free online. This landmark book is the best, most reliable summary of all that is hidden going on in our world that we've ever seen. Take the time to read it in full and you will not be disappointed.

Researched and Written by Timothy M. Silver

“I know the capacity that is there to make tyranny total in America. We must see to it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision, so that we never cross over that abyss. That is the abyss from which there is no return.”
~~ U.S. Senator Frank Church, 19751

Note: All research validated by over 500 footnotes with links provided to reliable sources.

1 Quoted by Pentagon Papers whistleblower Dan Ellsberg from his article in the UK's Guardian, “Edward Snowden: saving us from the United Stasi of America,” June 10, 2013

[Editor's Note] Lifting the Veil is the best single summary revealing the deepest levels of deception in our world we've seen. It uses highly reliable sources on almost everything presented with links to verify it all. If you don't have time to read the entire piece, skim the highlighted sections and don't miss chapter XIII which presents undeniable proof of cults made up of psychopaths hell bent on dominating and controlling our world. You will learn how they are able to keep all of this out of the eye of the public. This is a must read for all who want to be educated and join in building a brighter future for ourselves and for future generations.

"The problem of the Pathocracy seems to be so vast and complex; it is certainly intimidating. We are fortunate that the solutions are relatively simple. It begins and ends with education and non-participation. Ignorance is the sole tool that keeps the Pathocracy afloat. It's truly this easy. An awake populace can collectively choose to stop holding the pyramid above their shoulders by refusing to oil the gears of the machine. We need to collectively move our money out of big banks, support local enterprise over multinational corporations, and be excessively vocal about the truth."


Chapter II: The One-Party State

Chapter IV: Operation Paperclip

Chapter V: MK-ULTRA

Chapter VI: Operation Gladio

Chapter VII: Operation Mockingbird


Chapter IX: The Phoenix Program

Chapter X: Iran/Contra

Chapter XII: The Pedophocracy

Chapter XIII: Cults and Child Abuse

Chapter XV: The Pathocracy

Chapter XVI: Solutions

Chapter XVII: The Awakening

Researched and Written by Timothy M. Silver


NOVEMBER 24, 2013

There is growing evidence that the 'terrorist' attack on Mumbai in 2008 was the work of the security services of India, the USA and others.

The main planner of the Mumbai Attack was the American called David Headley.

David Headley in Mumbai

Adrian Levy and Cathy Scott Clark, British investigative journalists and authors of 'The Siege', remind us of the following:

1. David Headley's wife, Faiza, warned the American Embassy that David Headley was planning a terrorist attack in Mumbai.

She noted the lack of reaction from the embassy and came to the conclusion that David Headley could well be working for the Americans.


2. Headley and the other 'terrorists' in Mumbai had support from important people in Mumbai.

An agent in the Indian intelligence services helped carry out the terrorist attack in Mumbai in 2008.

The agent named "Honey Bee" is referred to in Levy and Scott-Clark's book "The Seige".

For the first 28 hours of the siege, the 4 Taj gunmen were almost completely unhindered.

It took 58 hours to end the siege - evidence that this was an inside job.

3. David Headley was a valued CIA asset.


4. Certain Indian intelligence agents accused their US counterparts of protecting Headley.

5. In 2009, certain agents from India's spy service RAW confronted the CIA and accused the US of having some responsibility for the deaths in Mumbai.

Serril Headley and son

6. David Headley's mother was Serrill Headley, a socialite and adventuress from Maryland.

His father worked for Voice of America (a CIA front).

David Headley worked for America's Drugs Enforcement Administration (DEA) which is very close to the CIA.

By 2008, David Headley was married to three women, none of whom knew of the others' existence.

David Headley in various disguises

The wife in the US grew suspicious after he championed the (CIA's) 9/11 attack, and she reporting him to the authorities.

David Headley's cousin Alex Headley, a soldier in the US Army, considered reporting him.

David Headley's mother Serril informed on him to the FBI.

Serrill Headley, who died ten months before Mumbai, told a friend that her son 'must have worked for the US government' . 

Monday, November 23, 2015

How US Generates Terrorists from Within and How to Defeat Them

Most politicians don’t want to solve a problem. More than likely, they will seek how they could exploit the situation for their own benefit. The problem about ISIS can’t be solve by politicians especially those who created it.

Obviously, even the Russian surgical bombardments in Syria can’t solve the problem of terror in the Middle East for good. That’s only because terror starts somewhere else.

81% of indicted ISIL suspects are US citizens

The overwhelming majority of terror suspects charged in the United States because of their alleged ties with Daesh (ISIL) are American citizens, new research reveals.

Of the 68 people who have been indicted because of alleged involvement in Daesh terrorism, 55 or about 81 percent are US citizens, including 44 who were born in America, according to a study published this week by Center on National Security at Fordham University.

Eighteen of those individuals have been convicted with an average sentence of more than 10 years.

The data further shows that only three of those indicted in the US were refugees and none came from Syria.

The research comes amid a mounting clamor in the United States over the perceived threat of refugees to national security.

“Law enforcement is being very careful about these arrests. They really don’t see a great domestic terrorism threat here. Of course we know that anything could happen but, compared to abroad, the terrorism threat is really quite low,” said Karen Greenberg, director of the center, according to the Guardian newspaper.

The US House of Representatives has overwhelmingly approved legislation to suspend President Barack Obama’s program to allow 10,000 Syrian refugees into the country.

The measure was approved by a vote of 289 to 137 Thursday, giving it the two-thirds majority the House would need to override a promised veto by Obama. The bill will now go to the Senate.

‘US generates terrorists from within’

An American political commentator says one should not be surprised at the fact that a majority of Daesh (ISIL) suspects arrested in the United States are of US origin and not from Syria.

“There should be no surprise by anyone that the arrest by the US government of terrorist suspects inside the US would be in the main born in the United States and overwhelmingly US citizens, despite the fear campaign that’s being conducted by a number of politicians,” Don DeBar told Press TV on Saturday.

The comments follow a new research, which has revealed that none of the suspects who have ever been charged in the United States came from Syria.

According to figures published this week by the Center on National Security at Fordham University, the overwhelming majority of the suspects were born in America.

The figures show that among 68 people, who have been indicted because of alleged involvement in the ISIL terror group, only three were foreigners and none came from Syria.

Among those indicted 55 or 80.9 percent of individuals are US citizens, including 44 who were born in the country.

The research classifies more than half arrested of those and charged as “foreign fighters/ aspirants.” Around a quarter are “domestic plotters” and about one-fifth are “facilitators.

“They are young, they are spread over a wide geography, they are impervious to profiling in many ways,” said Karen Greenberg, director of the center.

This is while on Thursday, the US House of Representatives approved legislation to suspend President Barack Obama’s program to allow 10,000 Syrian refugees into the country. Under the proposal, no refugees from Syria or Iraq could enter the US until stricter screening measures are in place.

Debar also spoke of how “the techniques that are employed by the US to extend its power and influence outside of conventional warfare…, end up producing exactly this kind of effect.”

“When you are generating terrorists within the United States to go somewhere else and act as agents of the United States,…then they come back here.”

He added, “None of this should be a surprise. The term that people use, the colloquial term is ‘blowback’ and blowback, of course, is inevitable.”

Journalist who returned from Islamic State HQ tells RT how jihadists can be defeated

RT spoke to Jurgen Todenhofer, the first Western journalist who was allowed to enter territory controlled by the so-called Islamic State. A year ago, he spent 10 days among the terrorists, also visiting Raqqa, the capital of the self-proclaimed caliphate.

To arrange the journey, Todenhofer held Skype discussions with Islamic State (formerly ISIS/ISIL) for six months before they agreed to his visit.

Finally, the jihadists gave him official guarantee safety. “It was in their interest to fulfill their promises that I would come back alive – and I came back alive,” he said.

After spending several days with ISIS militants, having long discussions with them and observing their daily life, the German journalist said: “They don’t care if we call them terrorists.”

The streets of Raqqa are full of people, cars and functioning businesses, life seemed to be completely normal, Todenhofer said, but one should keep in mind that the Islamists had killed or driven off all the Shias and Christians, so the only people there were Sunnis.

The jihadists are not interested in picking on ordinary people as long as they abide by the Sharia law, they are after important people, the journalist said.

Yet the fear is out there. “If you make a mistake, you can be killed,”Todenhofer said, recalling people being punished with jail terms for offenses such as paying a visit to a girlfriend or using sleeping pills, which are prohibited.

“People know it is dangerous,” Todenhofer said, but an ordinary person there does not care, because “his life was not [much fun] before, under the control of the Shia government, which they did not like either.”

There are not too many women on the streets of Raqqa, and those few are completely covered with a veil. Only very old women do not have to wear a veil, Todenhofer recalled.

“Because if they are not nice and pretty anymore – they are allowed to show their face.”

Todenhofer told RT’s Neil Harvey that on ISIS’s territory, he met people from Russia’s Caucasus, but also from Germany, France, Britain and of course he asked all of them why they had come.

He said he had the impression that all the Muslims who joined ISIS used to be completely unimportant in their countries, were not accepted there and were considered second-class citizens.

“They are told that in Islamic State they will fight a historic fight, a final fight between good and evil,” he said.

“Those young people who were completely unimportant in their countries will be very important [here]. And for the first time in their life, somebody is telling them that they are important,” the journalist said.

Those young men are told they are going to be real stars and heroes, they will have a Kalashnikov and fight against the Americans and so on.

“They played all those video games where killers are the stars. And they believe they are going to be stars now.”

“They are brainwashed, of course, it’s a very successful combination of fanaticism and a very clever military drill they get from Saddam Hussein’s former officers,” Todenhofer said, adding: “They think that they are in a big story now and they are playing a very important role.”

For those European youth who come to Islamic State, the way back is effectively closed, because those who want to return home are considered traitors who have to be killed.

Also, those who believed they were going to fight American and British troops have realized that in reality they are killing innocent Muslims.

“They are realizing that the story they were told is completely wrong. They don’t live in luxury like they were told in Germany, [instead] they live a very simple life, they don’t have food every day, not even water, it is cold in cheap apartments where they live, so life is completely different – and they have to kill Muslims. This is not what they were promised,”Todenhofer said.

The journalist believes the Islamists are killing hostages such as innocent American journalists to sow fear and to provoke Washington to send ground troops to the Syrian battlefield – because they want to fight against the Americans.

“I think now they would like to fight also against the Russian ground troops, because they have this story that they have to be a hero and fight against the champions, while the Muslims they have killed up until now were not champions and [the ISIS fighters] want to fight powerful people,” he said.

Naturally, the militants did not tell him everything, yet Todenhofer had the impression that Islamic State is still getting money and weapons from Gulf monarchies such as Saudi Arabia.

The weapons are also bought on the black market, where European-made guns are available as well, sometimes those supplied to the Kurdish Peshmerga or the Free Syrian Army (FSA).

“They told me,’Even if we don’t conquer these weapons, we can buy them, because everything has a price. Most of our ammunition we get from the Free Syrian Army.’”

This is the ammunition that Americans supplied to the FSA, which is now not important, or those groups which said they belong to the FSA, Todenhofer said.

ISIS is using guerilla warfare tactics, so bombing them is a hard task, because they disperse when the danger is close.

“I cannot judge the Russian army but I can judge the Western armies. The American Marines and special forces have no chance in a fight against guerilla fighters, because these fighters are ready to die, and Americans Marines do not want to die,” Todenhofer said.

To create real problems for ISIS, the West should do several things: stop the delivery of weapons, ammunition and money from the Gulf monarchies and close the Turkish border used to transit new fighters to ISIS, Todenhofer said, recalling how easy it was to cross the Syrian-Turkish border.

The third important thing is promoting reconciliation between Shia and Sunnis in Iraq, Syria and Turkey, because ISIS finds support among those dissatisfied with the governments and existing state of things.

Fighting ISIS needs an intelligent strategy, Todenhofer said.

The full neutralization of the Khazarian Mafia is the beginning of the solution to the problem of global terror. The other part of the solution is the total eradication of institutional control of all resources necessary for decent survival.

There is no feasible middle ground approach in all of these. Everyone must be empowered through scientific knowledge and abundance. All forms of suppression and willful manipulation must be stopped.

Friday, November 20, 2015

Subramanian Swamy's book promotes hatred between Hindus, Muslims

November 4, 2015

New Delhi: Justifying before the Supreme Court retention of penal provision for hate speeches and pitching for stern action against the defaulters, the Modi government on Tuesday recommended prosecution of BJP leader Subramanian Swamy for promoting hatred between Hindus and Muslims.

In a surprising turn of events, the government has told the Supreme Court that a book on terrorism authored by the BJP's firebrand leader is behind this provocation.

The affidavit filed by the government today was in response to Swamy's petition challenging the constitutional validity of the Indian Penal Code Section 153A on the grounds that it violates free speech.

According to a report published in TOI, Swamy had earlier challenged before the SC various provisions of the Indian Penal Code dealing with offences of 'hate speech', saying they were violative of the fundamental right to freedom of speech.

Swamy had contended in his plea that Sections 153, 153A,153B, 295, 295A, 298 and 505 of the IPC in respect of so-called "hate speech" were used to penalise people for expressing their views even within the bounds of reasonable restrictions and they should be set aside.

Government's recommendation, against one of the senior BJP leaders, has come at a time when the governing body itself is being criticised for not being able to rein in its ministers and leaders of ruling party who are making provocative speeches.

As per the report, the Centre further said that the validity of the penal provisions cannot be questioned as the Constitution allows reasonable restriction on citizen's right to freedom of speech and the provisions are meant to maintain peace and harmony in the society.

"It is respectfully submitted that our country is inhabited by persons belonging to different religions, castes and classes. Our Constitution is base upon the principle that persons of all castes, creed and religion must live together in harmony and that in the long run prosperity and salvation are in union and not in division," the Centre told the court.

Notably, Swamy is also facing various criminal proceedings in Delhi, Mumbai, Assam, Mohali and Kerala for expressing views on terrorism which was termed as hate speech under the IPC provisions. He alleged that the provisions dealing with offences of 'hate speech' were violative of the fundamental right to freedom of speech and were being were used to penalise people for expressing their views even within the bounds of reasonable restrictions and they should be set aside.

However, opposing Swamy's plea, the Centre said "the provisions are very clear and neither too widely worded nor is indefinite and intended to punish those who either attempt to promote class hatread or class enmity,"

It also justified criminal proceedings against Swamy saying "he made hate speech against a community" in his book. "The book is to be considered in all its aspects as it contains matter which promotes feeling of enmity and hatred between Hindus and Muslims in India. Therefore the petitioner has violated Sections of IPC," the affidavit said.

Section 153 deals with provoking people with the intent to cause riot and Section 153A talks about promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language etc. Section 295 makes injuring or defiling places of worship with the intent to insult the religion of any class an offence. Section 298 covers cases of hurting religious sentiments deliberately.

Agreeing to decide constitutional validity of penal provision in respect of hate speech, the Supreme Court in July had issued notice to Centre and sought its response.

Swamy in his petition contended that under the present law, a person couldn't attempt to initiate a public debate to modify people's perception as the person was "chilled or gagged" under the present law.

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

“Going After” the Islamic State. Guess Who is Behind the Caliphate Project?

Global Research, November 17, 2015

Author’s note and Update

The following article was first published in September 2014 at the outset of the air campaign “against the ISIS”. In recent developments Russia has officially joined the campaign against the Islamic State (ISIS). What are the implications?

Amply documented but rarely mentioned in news reports, the ISIS is a creation of US intelligence, recruited, trained and financed by the US and its allies including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Israel and Jordan. 

What this means is that the ISIS terrorists are the foot soldiers of the Western alliance. While America claims to be targeting the ISIS, in reality it is protecting the ISIS. The air campaign is intent upon destroying Syria and Iraq rather than “going after the terrorists”. 

But now Russia is involved in the campaign against the ISIS in coordination with the Syrian and Iraqi governments. 

What does that mean? The official story is that Russia supports America’s resolve to fight the terrorists. It’s all for a good cause.

In reality, however, Russia is (indirectly) fighting America by supporting the actions of the Syrian and Iraqi governments against the ISIS terrorists, who happen to be the foot soldiers of the Western military alliance, with Western mercenaries and military advisers within their ranks.

The forbidden truth is that by providing military aid to both Syria and Iraq, Russia is (indirectly) confronting America. Moscow will be supporting both countries in their proxy war against the ISIL which is supported by the US and its allies.

Michel Chossudovsky, September 30, 2015

* * *

The Islamic State (IS) is portrayed as an Enemy of America and the Western world. 

With the support of America’s indefectible British ally, President Barack Obama has ordered a series of US bombing raids on Iraq allegedly with a view to defeating the rebel army of the Islamic State (IS).

“We will not waver in our determination to confront the Islamic State … If terrorists think we will weaken in the face of their threats they could not be more wrong.” (Barack Obama and David Cameron, Strengthening the NATO alliance, op ed published in the London Times, September 4, 2014, emphasis added)

But Who is behind the Islamic State Project?

In a bitter irony, until recently the rebels of the Islamic State, formerly known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) were heralded as Syria’s “opposition freedom fighters” committed to “restoring democracy” and unseating the secular government of Bashar al Assad.

And who was behind the jihadist insurgency in Syria?

Those who ordered the bombing campaign are those who are behind the Caliphate Project.

The Islamic State (IS) militia, which is currently the alleged target of a US-NATO bombing campaign under a “counter-terrorism” mandate, was and continues to be supported covertly by the United States and its allies.

In other words, the Islamic State (IS) is a creation of US intelligence with the support of Britain’s MI6, Israel’s Mossad, Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and Saudi Arabia’s General Intelligence Presidency (GIP), Ri’āsat Al-Istikhbārāt Al-’Āmah ( رئاسة الاستخبارات العامة‎). Moreover, according to Israeli intelligence sources (Debka) NATO in liaison with the Turkish High Command has been involved in the recruitment of jihadist mercenaries from the outset of the Syrian crisis in March 2011.

In relation to the Syrian insurgency, the Islamic State fighters together with the Al Qaeda affiliated jihadist forces of the Al Nusrah Front are the foot soldiers of the Western military alliance. They are covertly supported by US-NATO-Israel. Their mandate is to wage a terrorist insurgency against the government of Bashar al-Assad. The atrocities committed by Islamic State fighters in Iraq are similar to those committed in Syria.

As a result of media disinformation, Western public opinion is unaware that the Islamic State terrorists have from the very outset been supported by the United States and its allies.

The killings of innocent civilians by the Islamic State terrorists in Iraq are used to create a pretext and a justification for US military intervention on humanitarian grounds. The bombing raids ordered by Obama, however, are not intended to eliminate the Islamic State, which constitutes a US “intelligence asset”. Quite the opposite, the US is targeting the civilian population as well as the Iraqi resistance movement. 

The Role of Saudi Arabia and Qatar

Amply documented, US-NATO support to the Islamic State is channeled covertly through America’s staunchest allies: Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Acknowledged by the Western media, both Riyadh and Doha acting in liaison and on behalf of Washington have played (and continue to play) a central role in the financing the Islamic State (IS) as well as the recruitment, training and religious indoctrination of terrorist mercenary forces deployed in Syria.

According to London’s Daily Express “They [the Islamic State terrorists] had money and arms supplied by Qatar and Saudi Arabia.”

“The most important source of ISIS financing to date has been support coming out of the Gulf states, primarily Saudi Arabia but also Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates,” (According to Dr. Günter Meyer, Director of the Center for Research into the Arabic World at University of Mainz, Germany, Deutsche Welle)

This money was channeled to ISIS terrorists fighting against government forces in Syria:

“Through allies such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the West [has] supported militant rebel groups which have since mutated into ISIS and other al‑Qaeda connected militias. ( Daily Telegraph, June 12, 2014)

According to Robert Fisk, the IS caliphate project “has been bankrolled by Saudi Arabia”:

…[M]eet Saudi Arabia’s latest monstrous contribution to world history: the Islamist Sunni caliphate of Iraq and the Levant, conquerors of Mosul and Tikrit – and Raqqa in Syria – and possibly Baghdad, and the ultimate humiliators of Bush and Obama.

From Aleppo in northern Syria almost to the Iraqi-Iranian border, the jihadists of Isis and sundry other groupuscules paid by the Saudi Wahhabis – and by Kuwaiti oligarchs – now rule thousands of square miles. (Robert Fisk, The Independent, June 12, 2014

In 2013, as part of its recruitment of terrorists, Saudi Arabia took the initiative of releasing prisoners on death row in Saudi jails.

A secret memo revealed that the prisoners were being “recruited” to join jihadist militia (including Al Nusrah and ISIS) to fight against government forces in Syria.

Saudi prison
The prisoners had reportedly been offered a deal — stay and be executed or fight against Assad in Syria. As part of the deal the prisoners were offered a “pardon and a monthly stipend for their families, who were allowed to stay in the Sunni Arab kingdom”.

Saudi officials apparently gave them a choice: decapitation or jihad? In total, inmates from Yemen, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, Jordan, Somalia, Afghanistan, Egypt, Pakistan, Iraq, and Kuwait chose to go and fight in Syria.(See Global Research, September 11, 2013)

“Volte Face”: About Turn

On September 11, 2014, coinciding with the commemoration of 9/11, the King of Saudi Arabia together with the Monarchs of the Gulf States announced their unbending commitment to support Obama’s holy war against the Islamic State (IS), which has and continues to be funded by Qatari and Saudi money as part of a carefully engineered intelligence operation.

Secretary of State John F. Kerry, left, speaks with Joseph W. Westphal, the U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia, and Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal on his arrival at the King Abdulaziz International Airport in Jiddah, Saudi Arabia on Sept. 11, 2014. (Pool photo by Brendan Smialowski via Associated Press)

Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States which actively contributed to the financing of the Islamic State, not to mention the recruitment, training of terrorists on behalf of Washington, pledged their unbending support for Obama’s military campaign to “degrade and ultimately destroy” the Islamic State.

The statement of support contained in the communiqué, commits the “leading Arab states to working with the U.S. to cut off the flow of foreign fighters and funds to the Islamic State.” It also confirms that members discussed “a strategy to destroy the ISIL wherever it is, including in both Iraq and Syria.”

Saudi Arabia has come to understand the Islamic State group is a serious threat to their country as well– that it isn’t a mainstream Sunni movement.One element of Obama’s IS plan seeks to undermine the ideological and religious claims that the Islamic State militants make to Islam.

The administration hopes Riyadh will use its influence among Islamic religious leaders. (Voice of America, September 11, 2014)

Recruiting “Moderate Terrorists”

As part of the agreement, the House of Saud is to “host a training facility for thousands of Syrian rebel fighters who are combating both the Islamic State and President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.” An absurd and fake proposition. Until September 9th, “officially” Saudi Arabia had been supporting the Islamic State against the government of Bashar al Assad and now it has been entrusted in recruiting jihadists to fight the Islamic State. An absurd and fake proposition. But the media has failed to connect the dots and uncover the big lie.

We are dealing with a diabolical project: The architects of the Islamic State have informed the World that they are “going after” their own terrorists as part of a counter-terrorism operation.

While these actions are undertaken under the banner of the “Global War on Terrorism”, the US has no intention to target its IS own terror brigades which are integrated by Western special forces and intelligence operatives. In fact the only meaningful and effective campaign against Islamic State terrorists is being waged by Syrian government forces.

Needless to say, US, NATO, Saudi and Qatari support and funding to the Islamic State will continue. The objective is not to destroy the Islamic State as promised by Obama. What we are dealing with is a US sponsored process of destabilizing and destroying both Iraq and Syria. The campaign against the Islamic State is being used as a justification to bomb both countries, largely targeting civilians.

The endgame is to destabilize Iraq as a nation state and trigger its partition into three separate entities.

The broader US-NATO strategic objective is to destabilize the entire Middle East- North Africa 

-Central Asia -South Asia region, including Iran, Pakistan and India.

Order directly from Global Research
by Michel Chossudovsky

In this new and expanded edition of Michel Chossudovsky’s 2002 best seller, the author blows away the smokescreen put up by the mainstream media, that 9/11 was an attack on America by “Islamic terrorists”. Through meticulous research, the author uncovers a military-intelligence ploy behind the September 11 attacks, and the cover-up and complicity of key members of the Bush Administration. 

The expanded edition, which includes twelve new chapters focuses on the use of 9/11 as a pretext for the invasion and illegal occupation of Iraq, the militarisation of justice and law enforcement and the repeal of democracy.

According to Chossudovsky, the “war on terrorism” is a complete fabrication based on the illusion that one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40 billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus. The “war on terrorism” is a war of conquest. Globalization is the final march to the “New World Order”, dominated by Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex.

September 11, 2001 provides a justification for waging a war without borders. Washington’s agenda consists in extending the frontiers of the American Empire to facilitate complete U.S. corporate control, while installing within America the institutions of the Homeland Security State.

The original source of this article is Global Research
Copyright © Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, 2015