THE USE OF KNOWLEDGE IS POWER

In A Time Of Universal Deceit, Telling The Truth Becomes A Revolutionary Act. (Orwell)

ALL TRUTH PASSES THROUGH THREE STAGES; FIRST, IT IS RIDICULED, SECOND, IT IS VIOLENTLY OPPOSED, THIRD, IT IS ACCEPTED AS BEING SELF-EVIDENT. (Arthur Schopenhauer)

I WILL TELL YOU ONE THING FOR SURE. ONCE YOU GET TO THE POINT WHERE YOU ARE ACTUALLY DOING THINGS FOR TRUTH'S SAKE, THEN NOBODY CAN EVER TOUCH YOU AGAIN BECAUSE YOU ARE HARMONIZING WITH A GREATER POWER. (George Harrison)

THE WORLD ALWAYS INVISIBLY AND DANGEROUSLY REVOLVES AROUND PHILOSOPHERS. (Nietzsche)

Search This Blog

Blog Archive

Thursday, September 29, 2016

Intelligence Beyond Thought


In 1980 Indian spiritual philosopher J. Krishnamurti met with physicist David Bohm to talk about “insight, illusion, awakening, transcendence, renewal, morality, the temporal, and the spiritual.” Their conversations are captured in The Ending of Time: Where Philosophy and Physics Meet.

In part of their discussions, Krishnamurti and Bohm explore the existence of an intelligence that transcends thought. For Krishnamurti, thought has a basis in our physical being and is “born out of the image of what has been accumulated.” This accumulation occurs throughout our lifetime — or lifetimes — and results in a habitual movement of the mind between the extreme poles of the particular (personal) and the general (universal).

In order to break free of the cycle of accumulation, we first have to recognize that our thought patterns, or habits, exist. But that may not be enough. We also need to be able to stop the continual movements. This requires intelligence, but a form of intelligence very different from what we know as “ordinary intelligence.”

Krishnamurti suggests that this intelligence is related to love. Not the romantic or physical love that you experience when you have a crush on someone, but a love that is beyond the human realm. This ‘intelligent’ love is not personal, but it is also not general. It encompasses both of those and transcends them. It is “light”.

This type of love can break down the barrier between our perceptions and the Truth of reality, a wall that we build higher and wider with every habitual thought. Or as Krishnamurti puts it, “The wall is this movement. So when this movement ends, that quality of intelligence, love and so on, is there.”

Later in their conversations, Krishnamurti and Bohm discuss why it’s so difficult to become aware of that wall and break it down. Even if we notice one of our patterns and are able to let go of it, our mind will soon latch onto another one. We may do this to protect ourselves or because we don’t care. There could be many reasons for always putting another brick in the wall.

Bohm suggests that we get stuck in this “groove” because we impart significance to thoughts, some more significance than others: “Because this knowledge seems to have a tremendous value beyond all other values, it makes the mind stick to that. It seems the most important thing in the world (…) Knowledge stupefies the mind.”

Once knowledge is given importance, a strong defensive mechanism is put in place to prevent the mind from seeing that its divisiveness is destructive, to resist the flowering of intelligence and to reinforce our illusions.

In the end, says Bohm, “This knowledge creates the me.” That illusion of a self masquerades as a separate entity, “a real being”, whereas it really resides in knowledge itself.


By Shawn Radcliffe and Jeanric Meller

Science and Nonduality provides a forum where preeminent scientists, philosophers, teachers, artists and a large, international community gather to explore and advance the new paradigm emerging in spirituality, that is both grounded in cutting-edge science and consistent with the ancient wisdom of nonduality — the deep understanding of the interconnectedness of life.

Wednesday, September 28, 2016

The War on Reality - How Globalists Occupy Your Mind to Control Everything

by TheHealthRanger

Mind-expanding mini-documentary from the Health Ranger rips to shreds the social engineering and 'belief control' manipulation of the masses. It's time to reclaim your mind from the globalist social engineers who are filling your skull with false narratives rooted in the failed philosophies of Big Government and social obedience.

It's time to FREE YOUR MIND, rise up against the tide and rage against the machine.

But to accomplish that, you must first wise up and blast through the false mental programming that has seized control of your entire cognitive reality.

Source

Thursday, September 1, 2016

ScorpeneLeak: Important Questions


The French company DCNS was contacted by The Australian newspaper on Monday with questions regarding the #ScorpeneLeak, to which they conducted a full workshop analysing the issue and later had a dialogue with the Australian politicians and Navy Chiefs as well on Tuesday. On the other hand Indian Defence Ministry woke up on Wednesday with a telephone call after the story was published. When the entire issue had a more sensitive bearing on India's submarine project than Australians why was India not informed directly by DCNS? Why did the Indian Defence Ministry not reprimand or asked for an explanation from DCNS regarding it? When the Australian had provided the entire chain of events and how exactly the data was leaked and reached Australia, on what basis did the Indian Def Min said it was a case of hacking? Moreover even without analysing the 22400 odd documents hoe could the Indian Navy say it leaked documents doesn't pose a threat to India's Project 75? And the reason given was that the key information was blacked out by the documents published online by The Australian newspaper! Is that a kind of statement you expect from a Naval officer? Because of such childish statements now the entire country has become a laughing stock for the world. Replying to such statements The Australian reporter Cameron Stewart who broke the story said, "When I say we will release a leaked document on Scorpene weapons systems, they will of course be redacted by us of sensitive information." and added that "India's defence minister is wrong to say leaked Scorpene docs do not include weapons info. will release (self-censored) weapons doc Monday." Why is the Indian Government and Navy trying to downplay this serious National Security issue? India can invoke a nondisclosure clause signed as part of the Scorpene submarine contract in 2005 for action against French manufacturer DCNS but the pact is not clear on penal action in case of data theft or espionage. Technically, the clause could be invoked and guarantees to the tune of Rs 1,800 crore frozen but such an action could face a strong legal challenge. This is really funny as Rs 1100 crore was already paid as a bribe to the Indian political establishment by the French company to get the Scorpene deal in the first place.

Here are some of the obvious questions that the Government should be asking:

1. Who was the French Naval officer who stole the data and who was his colleague accompanying him?
2. Were they working alone or with other persons/organisation?
3. Which South Asian countries he went to set up the commercial venture?
4. What was the nature of this commercial venture?
5. Which company did he contacted for the purpose?
6. Who was the western businessman who was contacted?