There are two ways to promote or authorize
prejudice, the negative and the positive. The negative way is brutally
simple. Pick any group and tar them, defame them, or dehumanize them. It
could be a racial group, ethnic entity, religious community, or
ideological camp. For example, consider all those Hollywood movies where
Arabs/Muslims were rarely little more than Jihadis or terrorists.
Present them as a bunch of ‘ragheads’, barely human ‘muzzies’ to mow
down when necessary, like in William Friedkin’s adaptation of Jim Webb’s
RULES OF ENGAGEMENT. (Webb, who opposed George W. Bush’s Iraq War,
should have known better than to produce such a pernicious work,
especially because it feigns balance before finally concluding ALL Arabs
to be a bunch of towel-head scum deserving to be mowed down from old
man to young girl.)
Negative prejudice is, of course, common during war-time, even though
current conventions decry overt caricaturing of the enemy, as happened
in World War I and World War II: The evil ‘Huns’ depicted as rapacious
gorillas or the vicious ‘Japs’ as rabid rodents. Granted, there’s still a
lot of fulminating about barbaric Iranians and cruel Russians, but it’s
hardly up to the levels of wars of yesteryear(except when depicting
‘white supremacists’).
However, there is another(and more insidious) way to
normalize and enforce official prejudice: The excessive positive
elevation of a certain group to the point of quasi-idolatry. Why would
this be? A mindless promotion of A doesn’t necessarily demean B, C, or
D. Just because A is made more popular or special doesn’t mean others
are robbed of their basic dignity and rights of humanity.
But this is true only insofar as A has no hostile agendas against B, C,
D, E, F, and/or etc. If indeed A does mean harm to, say, B and C, our
obsessive devotion to A inevitably blinds us to the interests,
rationales, and worthiness of B and C, because all we’d ever want to
care about is A-ALL-THE-WAY.
That is why idolizing certain groups is dangerous,
indeed far more than certain individuals. We know from celebrity culture
that idolatry turns certain figures into ‘stars’, ‘heroes’, and
‘icons’. The fans, who could number in the millions or even hundreds of
millions, are so taken with their idols that they often turn a blind eye
to the dark side of their demigods or, worse, even justify it as ‘cool’
or ‘badass’.
The dark side of populism was admitted when Donald Trump said that his
most devoted followers will vote for him even if he murdered someone in
cold blood. So many movie stars, rockers, rappers, and athletes have
gotten away with murder (figuratively speaking but literally in some
cases) simply because of widespread adoration. Oftentimes, bad behavior,
rotten values, and stupid attitudes were normalized simply because many
people tend to imitate their ‘heroes’. The weaponization of Taylor
Swift was on the assumption that the Swifties will do as their
goddess-princess decrees.
Idolization goes way beyond favoring something.
Rather, it favors something at the expense of others, even oneself. If
Bob, Bill, Peter, Jim, and Nicolas each favor the self, that’d be the
most natural thing. Each individual understandably prioritizes what is
essential and necessary for himself. There is fairness and balance in
each of the men favoring his own interest, of course within the rule of
law and principles of fair play.
The problem of idolatry arises when one of the guys, say Jim, is
accorded special status and fawned over by the others to the extent that
his interests, feelings, and well-being take precedence even over the
self among the others. So, Bob, Bill, Peter, and Nicolas will happily
sacrifice their own self-interest in order to favor Jim. But it can even
get worse if Jim harbors hostility toward, say, Nicolas. Suppose Jim
wants Nicholas’ house and car. Bob, Bill, and Peter’s devotion to Jim
would be such that they will berate Nicholas for protesting Jim’s
hostile moves against him.
Idolizing Jim didn’t necessarily dehumanize the others, but if Jim were
to turn hostile against anyone, idolatry translates into a bigotry
toward the target of his ire on the logic that, Jim being so awesome, he
must always be right, and whatever or whomever he hates must be in the
wrong, therefore even worthy of destruction. Thus, idolatry could easily
be the flipside of bigotry.
If we expand the example of individuals to ethnic
and racial groups in the US, there’s nothing untoward about various
groups favoring their own interests. It’s hardly surprising that the
Armenian-American community would be more fixated on what goes on in
Armenia and its diaspora. Same goes for Greek-Americans,
Italian-Americans, Mexican-Americans, Polish-Americans,
Burmese-Americans, and etc. Each group favoring its own kind isn’t
idolatry but merely natural self-interest. After all, if Irish-Americans
don’t prioritize Irishness and their culture and people, who will?
There is a kind of equality and mutuality of respect
when each group emphasizes what is most important to its people and
culture. Your people respect the other people’s priorities, and vice
versa. Your people don’t claim that their interests are first and
foremost for the entire country and neither do the peoples of other
ethnic groups. The varying interests may be unrelated — it’s doubtful if
anything meaning to a Pakistani-American community has any bearing on
the Cuban-American community and vice versa — , divergent, or in
conflict, but even if tensions arise, there is no danger of idolatry if
both contentious groups acknowledge that the entirety of the country
doesn’t exist to prioritize one ethnic interests or agendas uber alles.
For example, the Turkish-American community and the Greek-American
community may not see eye-to-eye on the issue of Cyprus, but both are
sensible enough to know that the US doesn’t exist to place Greek or
Turkish gripes on the front burner. Thus, both groups lobby for their
own ethnic or national interests, as do all the other groups.
But what if one group is elevated to the point of
idolatry? Not only does it serve its own interests(like all the others
do) but insists upon other groups to shower it with special attention,
then favors, then respect, then reverence, then obedience, then worship.
Suppose every group is pressed upon to praise and serve this particular
group, indeed care more about it than care about itself. While each
group’s ethnic interests are to remain mostly a ‘petty’ or ‘private’
affair, the interests of this particularly vaunted group is mandated as a
public ritual and spectacle. All must openly profess unconditional
support, devotion, and loyalty to this group.
So, while Greek-Americans must go through the usual channels(mostly
hidden from view) to pursue their own ethnic interests, their support
for this special group must be vocal and visible, loud and unambiguous.
In other words, Greek-American interests are merely ‘your business’, but
the interests of this special group are ‘OUR BUSINESS’, indeed duty and
mission.
Of course, the group we’re talking about is Jewish. The two other groups
with similar status(though largely owing to Jewish power of selection
and promotion) are the blacks and the homos.
Now, if the specially favored group only craves hugs
and kisses, it wouldn’t be so bad. While undue attention showered upon
it robs other groups of their own concerns, at least it won’t generate
hostility and hatred for other groups. But suppose the special group not
only hogs most of the positive attention but insists, indeed demands,
that all the other groups direct negative rage against whatever groups
it has a vendetta against. Not only must we kiss its feet but we must
kick the butts of its designated enemies, even if they’ve done us no
harm or harbored ill will towards us. Thus, the idolatry for the special
group can easily turn into a kind of bigotry, spawning a whole bunch of
Idolatrous-Bigots or Idolots.
Idolatry for the Jews have turned many Americans
into idolots, often unsuspectingly so. Whereas bigots are easy to
recognize, not so with the idolots whose mindless hatred are usually
shrouded in words of love. In the 1980s, plenty of bigoted movies
featuring ‘raghead’ Muslim terrorists were common, but such blatant
propaganda have fallen out of fashion. Yet, the great majority of
Americans, even those who are critical of Israel, still favor
Jews/Zionists over Arabs/Muslims. It owes to the continuing idolatry of
the Jews.
So, it’s no longer about hating Palestinians, Arabs, or Muslims as
natural-born terrorists but emphasizing the Jews as the Holy Holocaust
people, the God’s Chosen, the high IQ genius folks, or funny fellas(via
comedy). If someone says, “Muzzies suck and let’s nuke them all”, that’s
obvious bigotry, and everyone would notice and condemn it(except for
some Republicans who hardly batted an eye when Sheldon Adelson said Iran
should be nuked). But if someone says, “We love Israel so much, and
Jews are so special, and we must do everything for them”, people often
forget that such favoring of one group often leads to a policy of
dehumanization toward any group that happens to be in the crosshairs of
Jewish Power.
So much of the US foreign policy woes can be traced
back to Judeolatry. Why did so many Americans become rabidly and
virulently hateful toward Russians, Iranians, Syrians, and Palestinians?
Why did so many people become anti-white, demeaning any expression of
white identity and interests as ‘white supremacist’? Why do so many
white people hate themselves, their own race, ethnicity, roots, and
culture? More often than not, it’s because they put Judeolatry at the
center of their lives. You see, Jews are so great, special, wonderful,
wise, and awesome that whatever or whomever Jews denounce(via academia,
media, and government) surely deserves all the antipathy that humanity
can muster.
This is plainly evident among what still remains of
the Christian community in the West, especially America. As Christians,
you’d think they care about the well-being of fellow Christians in the
Arab World, but they’d rather cheer on the Zionist violence against the
Arabs on grounds that Jews are so special that they’re justified even in
bombing and slaughtering scores of Christians on the other side of the
world. And, if any Christian, white or Arab, draws attention to this
madness, he or she is immediately derided as an ‘Anti-Semite’ and
‘canceled’ by the so-called Christian or Conservative community.
Consider the time when Christian Arab-Americans called upon Senator Ted
Cruz to address the issue of Israel’s attack on Christians in Syria. The
cuck-faced turd-maggot of Texas growled and brushed them off as
possible ‘Anti-Semites’. Some Christian!
US soldier signs Israel’s national anthem. pic.twitter.com/CzmifDjtUw
— Lord Bebo (@MyLordBebo) October 20, 2024
It’s the truth. The main reason why so many
Americans hate Russia and Iran is simply sue to Jewish animus, i.e.
Russia and Iran are relatively free of World Jewry, at least by the
totally cucked standards of the West.
Often, the true rationale for hatred is subconscious because no one
wants to admit that he or she is a mental stooge or cuck-puppet of the
Jews, but deep in their corrupted hearts is the wish to appease Jews and
win their approval. So, as Jews hate Russia, we must hate it too and
convince ourselves that the reason why Russia opted for military
solution in Ukraine is because barbaric Slavs are hot-blooded, even
though it’s more than evident that Russia has been maddeningly patient
over the years despite the series of provocations by the Jewish-run
West.
Judeolatry always prioritizes Jews among the
non-Jews. Thus, a common question is whether one acknowledges that
“Israel has a right to exist” while conveniently forgetting or ignoring
the fact that Israel was created by denying the right of Palestine’s
existence. The positive sympathy bordering on worship for the Jews has
turned into contemptuous dismissal of all claims by peoples who were
wronged by Jews.
It’s why white so-called ‘conservatives’ always turn a blind eye to
those at odds with Israel, characterizing them as ‘terrorists’ or
‘Jew-haters’ simply because they resist the injustice done to them by
Jewish Power.
Take Iran and the Jews. Israel has been provoking
Iran to no end, even using outright terrorism to murder Iranian
scientists, engineers, and diplomats. But, not only do Jewish Zionists
at the NYT place quotes around ‘terrorist’(as, when Jews do it, it’s not
quite terror) but the pro-Zionist goy idolots always blame Iran despite
the slings and arrows hurled at it by World Jewry. If goy idolots
watched a Jew strike an Iranian, they’d pretend not to notice. If the
Jew then spat on and kicked the Iranian, the goy idolots would look the
other way or take sick pleasure in the rightful Jewish Master meting out
punishment upon the lowly ‘Muzzie’ slave. But, suppose the Iranian
finally had enough and pushed back at the Jew. The goy idolots will
predictably scream ‘foul’ and express outrage at such ‘brutality’.
But then, it’s the same dynamic over Jews and whites. Jews attack and
defame whites constantly, but most ‘conservatives’ either pretend not to
notice or blame the ‘left'(or surreally invoke ‘China’); but then, the
minute a white or conservative notices what’s happening and raises the
JQ, the ‘conservative’ community goes into hyper-overdrive of howling
about ‘Anti-Semitism’.
Consider what Israel’s been doing to Syria and Iran
forever. World Jewry and their brownnosing goy puppets pulled every
trick in the book to turn Syria into a neo-Medieval ash heap nearly
overrun by crazed Jihadis, but Syria was saved at the last minute by
Russia and Iran. And for that reason, all Americans are obligated to
hate Russia and Iran. (The very people who don’t care about and even
cheer on Jews slaughtering Arabs/Muslims will then suddenly say ‘Assad
must go’ for ‘gassing’ his people, which turned out to be yet another
Jewish lie.) Israel can lob any number of missiles into Syria and use
terror on Iran, and the goy idolots will either ignore or defend such
transgressions, but the moment Iran strikes back after every last ounce
of patience has run dry, the West will throw tantrums about Iranian
‘aggression’.
Likewise, Jews are allowed to spew any amount of
abuse at whites, demeaning and defaming them as ‘white supremacists’ and
‘nazis’ and etc. If Palestinians, Arabs, and Iranians who resist World
Jewry are ‘terrorists’ and ‘radicals’, whites who want to restore their
identity and agency are ‘white supremacists’ or the ‘far right’ even
though they harbor no desire to rule the world. Viktor Orban, for
example, is deemed as ‘far right’ for the moderate desire to preserve
his nation’s people and culture. How dare whites have an identity and
agenda independent of the decrees of World Jewry.
Sadly, so many white people, in their blind worship
of Jews, have internalized anti-white passions(that sometimes border on
pathological hysteria whenever Jews sound the alarm bell of ‘nazi’ or
‘white supremacist’ or ‘far right’). Such white people have been
conditioned to believe that whites exist to serve the Other, especially
the Jew, because apparently whites serving whites is ‘supremacist’.
Now, if whites insisted not only on whites serving
whites but nonwhites serving whites as well(as was the case during the
Age of Western Empires), one could raise the issue of ‘white supremacy’.
But most whites on the Right believe that every people should guard
their own identity, preserve their own culture, and serve their own
interests, e.g. whites serving whites, browns serving browns, yellows
serving yellows, blacks serving blacks.
If anything, it’s the Jews who insist that all non-Jewish groups
prioritize what’s-good-for-Jews over any other consideration. So, if a
goy is faced with the choice of doing something that is better for his
kind at the expense of Jews and doing something that is better for the
Jews at his own kind’s expense, he’s obligated to choose the latter.
It’s no wonder that so many whites do things that
are obviously detrimental to their own kind, often on grounds that
nothing is worthier than appeasing and pleasing the awesome Jews who,
being so smart and special and/or chosen, deserve to have everything on a
silver platter.
Indeed, even those who defy World Jewry feel obligated to support Israel
or, at the very least, not name the Jew. So, Viktor Orban and other
‘far right’ politicians in Europe support Israel, even though most Jews
want to do to their nations what was done to the Palestinians. What is
the ‘Great Replacement’ but White Nakba orchestrated by Jews via the
migration-invasion of the West by the Third World?
And in the case of Putin and his cohorts, they dare not Name the Power
that’s been most instrumental in instigating the war in Ukraine. The
world seems unperturbed by countless Ukrainian Slavs having been
sacrificed on the battlefield in a conflict that was really about Jews
using Ukraine as their gangster headquarters in Europe and as a ramming
rod against Russia. When idolatry of a group runs so deep, even its
targeted enemies are afraid to spell out the plain truth and expose its
evil core.
While Jews are the tops when it comes to idolatry,
blacks and homos also enjoy the special group privilege of unconditional
adoration and celebration. They are usually discussed in terms of
tragic victimhood and/or triumphant victory, and of course, the two
modes go together as people tend to feel the most sorrow for the most
special. With the Jewish media having elevated homos to angel status, an
average American is more likely to be triggered by some homo being
called ‘fag’ than about the Zionist-led US dropping bombs and killing
civilians in the Middle East. And while we hear about the persecution of
homosexuals around the world, what goes undiscussed is the role of
homosexuals in the US deep state to further Zionist-US aggression and
mass mayhem. Homos are the main co-imperialists alongside the genocidal
and supremacist Zionists.
With the worldwide goy fascination with blacks
ranging from Michael Jackson to Michael Jordan, it’s easy to understand
the appeal of MLK and Mandela(and now even George Floyd). Jews have
played on this psychological feature of humanity to promote idolatry of
blacks, especially among whites whose submission to Jewry is the
indispensable foundation of Zionic hegemony. Jews must sit atop the
White Horse that is robbed of agency.
Now, if blacks were mostly nice, Negro-Idolatry or
Negrolatry might only have limited impact. It would draw excessive
attention to stuff like the Super Bowl, college basketball, or popular
entertainment at the expense of other matters, but it wouldn’t break a
society.
But, in fact, blacks are the most aggressive, pathological, wild,
savage, and destructive race on the planet. They’ve already leveled
entire cities(like Detroit) and entire parts of cities in Baltimore, St.
Louis, Chicago, Milwaukee, Oakland, and so on. If not for the ‘gibs’
provided by whites(and others) to the blacks in the US, most black
communities would soon regress to the state of Haiti or, at best,
Jamaica.
Kick Streamer Prime bumps into White people on purpose and asks them what are they going to do.
“F*ck White people, I’m not moving for no white people” pic.twitter.com/7ZotN39n2n
— Charging… (@RedPillSayian) October 19, 2024
Yet, the idolatry of blacks means either turning a
blind eye to the victims of blacks or even blaming them(or blaming
others for what blacks do). So, even though the idolatry of blacks
didn’t begin as hostility or hatred toward other groups, it de facto
turns into that very thing because the pro-black idolots(or
idolatrous-bigots) are inconvenienced by non-white victimhood that
upsets the cart of Negrolatry.
The preponderance of victimhood at the hands of blacks undermines the
faith in black wonderfulness, black nobility, black sanctity, black
wisdom, and etc.
So, whenever blacks act badly, the Jewish-run media and their cuck
consumers pretend the perpetrators are ‘youths’ or ‘lunch-time rowdies’.
If a crazed Negro in an SUV rams into white people, blame the car, not
the Negro. If Negroes steal too many cars, blame the car company for not
making the cars more secure. There was the case of Asian-Americans
blaming black-on-yellow violence on ‘white supremacists’ and MAGA. And
there’s the Jewish Media’s constant reminder of Emmett Till to convey
the message that, regardless of current black crime rates, the problem
is all due to past ‘racism’, thereby implicitly justifying black
behavior as unfortunate but all-too-understandable rebellion against a
‘systemic racism’.
Thus, the many victims of blacks are thrown under the bus, much like how
the victims of Jews are ignored as either nonexistent or deserving of
whatever violence meted out to them by Jews or their proxies, usually
the shabbos goy US military and NATO.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JlmqvPzDgqnS/
Perversely enough, blacks sometimes sympathize with
Palestinians as fellow victims and vice versa, but what would have made
sense in the past no longer does today. When indeed blacks were
second-class citizens in the US, one could reasonably draw parallels
between the black experience and the Palestinian experience. But today,
blacks are venerated in the US, innumerable programs exist to favor
less-qualified blacks, tons of money are showered on the black
community(much like tons of aid sent to Israel), and furthermore, most
blacks in key institutions and industries are happy co-partners and
co-imperialists with the US empire. Lloyd Austin, that fat fried-chicken
and watermelon munching Negro, is a happy ‘Cogro’, or Co-Imperialist
Negro, who is more than happy to do the bidding of Jews, of course
alongside the white shabbos goy cucks, in instigating war in Ukraine,
raining bombs on the Middle East, occupying one-third of Syria, and
supplying Israel with more bombs to mass-slaughter women and children in
Gaza and Lebanon. For every prominent Negro who sticks his head out for
the Palestinians, ten other Negroes are happy to cheer on Zion and cuck
to Jews to serve as Cogros for World Jewry. Most prominent blacks are
more like Oprah, Obama, Lloyd Austin, Condolezza Rice, and etc. than
Cornel West. And when a Negro like Ta-Nehisi Coates wanders off the
plantation and talks about Jewish Evil, most prominent Negroes lend no
support because their priority is to preserve their own statuses and
privileges as Cogros.
Also, the US, far from being a land where rednecks
round-up innocent Negroes and hang them from trees while guzzling
moonshine, is now a place where most of the racial violence is
black-on-white and black-on-non-white(and of course black-on-black).
Thus, comparing blacks with Palestinians is now passe. Blacks in the US
today are more like Jewish ‘settlers’ in the West who feel emboldened in
attacking Palestinians, terrorizing Arabs, and gobbling up more and
more land. Just like black violence led to White Flight(and non-white
flight), Jewish-Zionist violence leads to Palestinian flight toward ever
dwindling territories in the West Bank. And of course, in current South
Africa, blacks act much like Jewish ‘settlers’ in Palestine. They
attack white farmers, often murdering them in the cruelest ways. But if
blacks at least have the right of indigenousness in South Africa, the
Jews doing the terror in the West Bank are relatively recent arrivals
from Europe(and America).
Because so many blacks are such ill-behaved louts
in a world where so many people are invested in Negrolatry(the false
fixation of blacks as holy and noble), the idolatry of blacks can only
lead to the bigotry against their victims. We now live in a world that
turns a blind eye to the victims of black violence(as if they don’t
exist or matter) or berates them if they dare to complain. Either get
brutalized and keep your mouth shut or shut the f*** up if you dare to
name the problem.
And it’s not just the ‘liberals’. Remember that Mike Johnson, the GOP
shabbos goy Congressman, told the country that we must understand and
forgive black violence in BLM 2020. Not one word about the victims of
black brutality. Predictably, he soon shilled for indiscriminate
Jewish-Zionist terror against the Palestinians following Oct 7. You see,
both blacks and Jews are so holy and noble that they always have reason
to mete out violence to whomever, and we must comply with the way-it-is
or cheer on the violence in ‘burn baby burn’ manner. Or pretend it is
‘mostly peaceful protest’. Maybe Jews and cucks will tell us the Gaza
Horror is ‘mostly peaceful genocide’.
Many on the ‘Right’ have long assumed that the
problem of Political Correctness and its more virulent form, ‘Wokeness’,
is the Cult of Equality, but if indeed the new order was about equal
justice for all, things would not be so bad because Jews, blacks, and
homos would face the same standards. Some draw the distinction between
‘equality’ and ‘equity’, with the former meaning equal opportunity and
the latter meaning equality of outcome, but even equity isn’t the main
culprit in the current order.
After all, if equity were indeed enforced, the higher institutions would
make sure that the various groups of goyim would be equally represented
alongside the Jews. Or it could ensure that ‘conservatives’ are just as
represented in the academia and media as the ‘liberals’ are. Or that
Arab-Americans are given the same voice and representation as the
Zionists. But where does anyone see ‘equity’?
No, the central theme of ‘wokeness’ isn’t equality
or equity but idolatry of certain groups, mainly Jews, Blacks, and
Homos. But then, most ‘right-wing’ types being brown-nosing shabbos goy
cucks, they want to pretend otherwise because their strategy of
‘winning’ is always to play the dog to the Jews as masters. “Gee, maybe
if we indulge Jewish Power with boundless talent and money, maybe the
Tribe will choose us as the top dog.” So, as Glenn Greenwald said, the
very ‘conservatives’ who decry censorship in defense of free speech will
turn on a dime and call for clamping down on ‘Anti-Semitic’ speech. The
very white conzos(conservative-bozos) who bitch and whine about racial
preferences and the like will go out and out to demand that Jews and
Israel be treated as special and sacred. And in so doing, the peoples,
cultures, and nations hated by Jews get no respect.
Ironically, of course, the people most hated by
Jews are the White Conservatives themselves, whose only purpose from the
Zionist perspective is to serve Israel and fight & die in its wars.
The likes of Ben Shapiro and useless cuck Christopher Rufo exist to
shepherd the ‘conservative’ movement to uphold ‘colorblind’
values(meaning whites should reject any white identity, agency, and
unity) while, at the same time, making an exception for Jews and Israel.
In other words, “I see no color but the technicolor of the Jewish
dreamcoat.”
https://twitter.com/dr_duchesne/status/1846947229778805209
Nick Fuentes explains how the entire right-wing is fake and controlled
https://www.bitchute.com/video/onXs0O9AzbfX/
By Jung-Freud • October 20, 2024