⬛️🌙🇺🇸 Deception, Leaked 🐍 ▪️ The behind-the-scenes footage of the Artemis II Mission was Leaked pic.twitter.com/9xsmvDmC6G
— karma (@karma44921039) April 12, 2026
Sunday, April 12, 2026
The behind-the-scenes footage of the Artemis II Mission was Leaked
Aliens Are Making Contact 3,000 Years Ahead; Warning We’re Making BIG Mistakes
For 41 years, Darryl Anka has served as the channel for Bashar — a multidimensional, physical extraterrestrial hybrid being from a parallel reality…and what he’s revealing now may change EVERYTHING.
Is humanity heading for a massive reset? Is 2026 the true Year of Disclosure?
And will we experience OPEN CONTACT in 2027 — literally being introduced to extraterrestrials?
In this episode of Mayim Bialik's Breakdown, Darryl explains why he believes the next few decades will redefine humanity forever, and how disclosure, contact, and even artificial intelligence are part of a larger evolutionary leap. Darryl Anka breaks down:
- Shocking story of how Darryl first began channeling Bashar after witnessing UAPs
- What it felt like the first time Bashar spoke through him in a meditation class (and what happens in his body and brain during channeling)
- Past-life agreement he says he made to become a channel in this lifetime
- Who Bashar really is: a “First Contact Specialist” from a parallel civilization making telepathic contact
- Why Bashar’s civilization is trying to help humanity evolve
- Why Darryl says everyone is channeling, whether they realize it or not
- Real requirements for believing he’s genuinely channeling (& what would disprove it)
- Phases of “Open Contact” & what we should be doing right now to prepare
- Why some humans experience alien abductions
- His take on the “Zoo Hypothesis”
- Are we living in a simulation? (Yes, but not how you think!)
- How extraterrestrials travel through space & time
- Why 2026 leads to disclosure & why 2027 could bring face-to-face contact
- Is AI the beginning of human hybridization?
- Telepathy, ESP, PSI, astral projection: How YOU can unlock them
- Why following your passion literally raises your frequency
- Why Earth is one of the most unique soul-learning environments in existence
- What reincarnation truly allows your soul to experience
- Guardian angels, spirit teams, & interventions from the other side
- Spontaneous healing & why energy healing sometimes doesn’t work
- How addiction keeps us spiritually stuck
- Creativity as a direct spiritual connection
- Why abundance isn’t just about money
- Bashar’s message for navigating illness, death, & the intense times we’re living inMar 24, 2026Watch episodes & bonus content ad-free on
Journey to The Edge of The Universe
Voyage on images taken from the Hubble telescope.
Explore the science and history behind the distant celestial bodies in the solar system.
National Geographic presents the first accurate non-stop voyage from Earth to the edge of the Universe using a single, unbroken shot through the use of spectacular CGI (Computer-Generated Imagery) technology.
Building on images taken from the Hubble telescope, 'Journey to the Edge of the Universe' explores the science and history behind the distant celestial bodies in the solar system.
This spectacular, epic voyage across the Cosmos, takes us from the Earth, past the Moon and our neighboring planets, out of our Solar System, to the nearest stars, nebulae and galaxies and beyond - right to the edge of the Universe itself...
When you finish this video, you will walk away from it with an awareness that you never had before, of the unseen astronomically massive universe that we float around on like a spec of dust in the ocean.
This video takes you on a journey through the universe as if you are watching a Sci Fi adventure.
Yet you constantly have to remind yourself that what you’re seeing is really out there...!
by Star Stuff
December 20, 2013
from YouTube Website
READ MORE
Cosmos
Explore the science and history behind the distant celestial bodies in the solar system.
National Geographic presents the first accurate non-stop voyage from Earth to the edge of the Universe using a single, unbroken shot through the use of spectacular CGI (Computer-Generated Imagery) technology.
Building on images taken from the Hubble telescope, 'Journey to the Edge of the Universe' explores the science and history behind the distant celestial bodies in the solar system.
This spectacular, epic voyage across the Cosmos, takes us from the Earth, past the Moon and our neighboring planets, out of our Solar System, to the nearest stars, nebulae and galaxies and beyond - right to the edge of the Universe itself...
When you finish this video, you will walk away from it with an awareness that you never had before, of the unseen astronomically massive universe that we float around on like a spec of dust in the ocean.
This video takes you on a journey through the universe as if you are watching a Sci Fi adventure.
Yet you constantly have to remind yourself that what you’re seeing is really out there...!
by Star Stuff
December 20, 2013
from YouTube Website
READ MORE
Cosmos
Global Warming - An Official Pseudoscience
On January 8, 2014, at New York University in Brooklyn, there occurred a unique event in the annals of global warming: nearly eight hours of structured debate between three climate scientists supporting the consensus on manmade global warming and three climate scientists who dispute it, moderated by a team of six leading physicists from the American Physical Society (APS) led by Dr. Steven Koonin, a theoretical physicist at New York University.
The debate, hosted by the APS, revealed consensus-supporting climate scientists harboring doubts and uncertainties and admitting to holes in climate science - in marked contrast to the emphatic messaging of bodies such as Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
At one point, Koonin read an extract from the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report released the previous year.
Computer model-simulated responses to forcings - the term used by climate scientists for changes of energy flows into and out of the climate system, such as changes in solar radiation, volcanic eruptions, and changes in the concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, "can be scaled up or down."
This scaling included greenhouse gas forcings.
Some forcings in some computer models had to be scaled down to match computer simulations to actual climate observations. But when it came to making centennial projections on which governments rely and drive climate policy, the scaling factors were removed, probably resulting in a 25 to 30 percent over-prediction of the 2100 warming.
The ensuing dialogue between Koonin and Dr. William Collins of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory - a lead author of the climate model evaluation chapter in the Fifth Assessment Report - revealed something more troubling and deliberate than holes in scientific knowledge:
Dr. Koonin: But if the model tells you that you got the response to the forcing wrong by 30 percent, you should use that same 30 percent factor when you project out a century.
Dr. Collins: Yes. And one of the reasons we are not doing that is we are not using the models as [a] statistical projection tool.
Dr. Koonin: What are you using them as?
Dr. Collins: Well, we took exactly the same models that got the forcing wrong and which got sort of the projections wrong up to 2100.
Dr. Koonin: So, why do we even show centennial-scale projections?
Dr. Collins: Well, I mean, it is part of the [IPCC] assessment process.
Koonin was uncommonly well-suited to lead the APS climate workshop.
He has a deep understanding of computer models, which have become the workhorses of climate science. As a young man, Koonin wrote a paper on computer modeling of nuclear reaction in stars and taught a course on computational physics at Caltech.
In the early 1990s, he was involved in a program using satellites to measure the Earth's albedo - that is, the reflection of incoming solar radiation back into space.
As a student at Caltech in the late 1960s, he was taught by Nobel physicist Richard Feynman and absorbed what Koonin calls Feynman's "absolute intellectual honesty."
On becoming BP's chief scientist in 2004, Koonin became part of the wider climate change milieu.
Assignments included, explaining the physics of man-made global warming to Prince Philip at a dinner in Buckingham Palace.
In 2009, Koonin was appointed an under-secretary at the Department of Energy in the Obama administration.
The APS climate debate was the turning point in Koonin's thinking about climate change and consensus climate science ("The Science").
"I began by believing that we were in a race to save the planet from climate catastrophe," Koonin writes in his new book, 'Unsettled - What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn't, and Why It Matters.'
"I came away from the APS workshop not only surprised, but shaken by the realization that climate science was far less mature than I had supposed."
"Unsettled" is an authoritative primer on the science of climate change that lifts the lid on The Science and finds plenty that isn't as it should be.
"As a scientist," writes Koonin, "I felt the scientific community was letting the public down by not telling the whole truth plainly."
Koonin's aim is to right that wrong.
Koonin's indictment of The Science starts with its reliance on unreliable computer models.
Usefully describing the earth's climate, writes Koonin, is, "one of the most challenging scientific simulation problems."
Models divide the atmosphere into pancake-shaped boxes of around 100km wide and one kilometer deep.
But the upward flow of energy from tropical thunder clouds, which is more than thirty times larger than that from human influences, occurs over smaller scales than the programmed boxes.
This forces climate modellers to make assumptions about what happens inside those boxes.
As one modeller confesses, "it's a real challenge to model what we don't understand."
Inevitably, this leaves considerable scope for modelers' subjective views and preferences.
A key question climate models are meant to solve is estimating the equilibrium climate sensitivity of carbon dioxide (ECS), which aims to tell us by how much temperatures rise from a doubling of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Yet in 2020, climate modelers from Germany's Max Planck Institute admitted to tuning their model by targeting an ECS of about 3° Centigrade.
"Talk about cooking the books," Koonin comments.
The proof of the pudding, as they say, is in the eating.
Self-evidently, computer projections can't be tested against a future that's yet to happen, but they can be tested against climates present and past.
Climate models can't even agree on what the current global average temperature is.
"One particularly jarring feature is that the simulated average global surface temperature," Koonin notes, "varies among models by about 3°C, three times greater than the observed value of the twentieth century warming they're purporting to describe and explain."
Another embarrassing feature of climate models concerns the earlier of the two twentieth-century warmings from 1910 to 1940, when human influences were much smaller.
On average, models give a warming rate of about half of what was actually observed.
The failure of the latest models to warm fast enough in those decades suggest that it's possible, even likely, that internal climate variability is a significant contributor to the warming of recent decades, Koonin suggests.
"That the models can't reproduce the past is a big red flag - it erodes confidence in their projections of future climates."
Neither is it reassuring that for the years after 1960, the latest generation of climate models show a larger spread and greater uncertainty than earlier ones - implying that, far from advancing, The Science has been going backwards.
That is not how science is meant to work.
The second part of Koonin's indictment concerns the distortion, misrepresentation, and mischaracterization of climate data to support a narrative of climate catastrophism based on increasing frequency of extreme weather events.
As an example, Koonin takes a "shockingly misleading" claim and associated graph in the United States government's 2017 Climate Science Special Report that the number of high-temperature records set in the past two decades far exceeds the number of low-temperature records across the 48 contiguous states.
Koonin demonstrates that the sharp uptick in highs over the last two decades is an artifact of a methodology chosen to mislead.
After re-running the data, record highs show a clear peak in the 1930s, but there is no significant trend over the 120 years of observations starting in 1895, or even since 1980, when human influences on the climate grew strongly.
In contrast, the number of record cold temperatures has declined over more than a century, with the trend accelerating after 1985.
Notes Koonin, "temperature extremes in the contiguous U.S. have become less common and somewhat milder since the late nineteenth century."
Similarly, a key message in the 2014 National Climate Assessment of an upward trend in hurricane frequency and intensity, repeated in the 2017 assessment, is contradicted 728 pages later by a statement buried in an appendix stating that there has been no significant trend in the global number of tropical cyclones, "nor has any trend been identified in the number of U.S. land-falling hurricanes."
That might surprise many politicians.
"Over the past thirty years, the incidence of natural disasters has dramatically increased," Treasury secretary Janet Yellen falsely asserted last month in a pitch supporting the Biden administration's infrastructure package.
"We are now in a situation where climate change is an existential risk to our future economy and way of life," she claimed.
The sacrifice of scientific truth in the form of objective empirical data for the sake of a catastrophist climate narrative is plain to see.
As Koonin summarizes the case: "Even as human influences have increased fivefold since 1950 and the globe has warmed modestly, most severe weather phenomena remain within past variability.
Projections of future climate and weather events rely on models demonstrably unfit for the purpose."
Koonin also has sharp words for the policy side of the climate change consensus, which asserts that although climate change is an existential threat, solving it by totally decarbonizing society is straightforward and relatively painless.
"Two decades ago, when I was in the private sector," Koonin writes, "I learned to say that the goal of stabilizing human influences on the climate was 'a challenge,' while in government it was talked about as 'an opportunity.'
Now back in academia, I can forthrightly call it 'a practical impossibility'."
Unlike many scientists and most politicians, Koonin displays a sure grasp of the split between developed and developing nations, for whom decarbonization is a luxury good that they can't afford.
The fissure dates back to the earliest days of the U.N. climate process at the end of the 1980s.
Indeed, it's why developing nations insisted on the U.N. route as opposed to an intergovernmental one that produced the 1987 Montreal Protocol on ozone-depleting substances.
"The economic betterment of most of humanity in the coming decades will drive energy demand even more strongly than population growth," Koonin says.
"Who will pay the developing world not to emit? I have been posing that simple question to many people for more than fifteen years and have yet to hear a convincing answer."
The most unsettling part of "Unsettled" concerns science and the role of scientists.
"Science is one of the very few human activities - perhaps the only one - in which errors are systematically criticized and fairly often, in time, corrected," Karl Popper wrote nearly six decades ago.
That condition does not pertain in climate science, where errors are embedded in a political narrative and criticism is suppressed.
In a recent essay, the philosopher Matthew B. Crawford observes that the pride of science as a way of generating knowledge - unlike religion - is to be falsifiable.
That changes when science is pressed into duty as authority in order to absolve politicians of responsibility for justifying their policy choices ("the science says," we're repeatedly told).
"Yet what sort of authority would it be that insists its own grasp of reality is merely provisional?" asks Crawford.
"For authority to be really authoritative, it must claim an epistemic monopoly of some kind, whether of priestly or scientific knowledge."
At the outset of "Unsettled," Feynman's axiom of absolute intellectual honesty is contrasted with climate scientist Stephen Schneider's "double ethical bind."
On the one hand, scientists are ethically bound by the scientific method to tell the truth. On the other, they are human beings who want to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climate change.
"Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest," Schneider said.
"Being effective" helps explain the pressure on climate scientists to conform to The Science and the emergence of a climate science knowledge monopoly.
Its function is, as Crawford puts it, the manufacture of a product - political legitimacy - which, in turn, requires that competing views be delegitimized and driven out of public discourse through enforcement of a, "moratorium on the asking of questions."
This sees climate scientist gatekeepers deciding who can and cannot opine on climate science.
"Please, save us from retired physicists who think they're smarter and wiser than everyone in climate science," tweeted Gavin Schmidt, NASA acting senior climate advisor, about Koonin and his book.
"I agree with pretty much everything you wrote," a chair of a university earth sciences department tells Koonin, "but I don't dare say that in public."
Another scientist criticizes Koonin for giving ammunition to "the deniers," and a third writes an op-ed urging New York University to reconsider Koonin's position there.
It goes wider than scientists...
Facebook has suppressed a "Wall Street Journal" review of "Unsettled."
Likewise, "Unsettled" remains unreviewed by the "New York Times," the "Washington Post" (though it carried an op-ed by Marc Thiessen based on an interview with Koonin) and other dailies, which would prefer to treat Koonin's reasoned climate dissent as though it doesn't exist.
The moratorium on the asking of questions represents the death of science as understood and described by Popper, a victim of the conflicting requirements of political utility and scientific integrity.
Many scientists take this lying down. Koonin won't...
For his forensic skill and making his findings accessible to non-specialists, Koonin has written the most important book on climate science in decades...
By Steven E. Koonin, Reviewed by Rupert Darwall
May 20, 2021
From RealClearEnergy Website
Unsettled: Climate Change's Real Story - 2026
Video Clip
Nanopolymer Weather Warfare
Nanopolymer Weather Warfare, "RFK Jr, EPA chief 'declare war' on
microplastics amid growing evidence of health risks" (FOX News).
Here's the real truth, RFK Jr. and EPA chief Lee Zeldin are pretending to address the microplastic pollution problem while categorically hiding and denying what is by far the most dangerous factor in this equation, climate engineering nanopolymer fallout.
Weather warfare is raging across the US and the world, extreme weather whiplash is now the norm.
"The US just had its warmest March ever, by a historic margin" (ABC News).
"Heat Wipes Out Western Snowpack, Raising Fears of Drought, Wildfire (New York Times).
'It's incredibly bad': No end in sight to Colorado River water crisis" (WyoFile).
There is no place to hide.
The latest installment of Global Alert News is below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czWarrYwHQc
---
Chemtrails and weather modification. To share with some fluoridated sheep in denial pic.twitter.com/UO6HfpnIAd
— karma (@karma44921039) April 12, 2026
Saturday, April 11, 2026
Prison Planet - If we want to Escape, we need to overcome the Slave Mentality that Society constantly imposes on us
There are people who refer to others as their "masters", their "guides", their "teachers", or say they need someone to "guide" them.
There's this constant tendency to look up to something external for direction, like they cant trust themselves to figure things out on their own.
Think about what that actually leads to.
If someone goes through their entire life like this, always looking for authority and needing guidance what do you think happens when they die?
Because if you've been conditioned your whole life to look for a "higher being", a "guide", a "teacher", something "loving" that tells you what to do, then the moment you cross over you're very likely going to do the exact same thing.
We are taught to refer to some people and things as,
"teachers", "guides", "experts", "source",
...all of that already puts you in a lower position.
It frames things in a way where you're beneath something, like you're supposed to listen and follow.
And then you have religions, which are probably the strongest example of this programming.
There is nothing more effective at training people into obedience and a slave-like mentality than religion.
It does not matter where you are from or which religion is dominant in your country, there is always something placed above you, and your role is to follow it and obey it.
That kind of submissive mindset makes people much easier to control.
Someone who sees themselves as,
their own authority is far harder to manipulate...
So if you spend your whole life looking for a "master", a "guide", a "teacher", what do you think you'll do when you end up in a completely unfamiliar state after death?
You'll follow the first thing that presents itself as one.
When you are young, you have teachers.
Then you grow up and you have a boss.
And even as an adult, other types of "teachers", "leaders", and authority figures show up in different areas of life.
So from the very beginning, you are conditioned to believe that you need to be guided, that you need someone above you to tell you what to do, like a sheep following a shepherd.
If that mindset is deeply ingrained in you, you are not suddenly going to become independent in the astral afterlife.
You are going to look for the same thing you have always looked for, a shepard to follow.
So if you are then presented with "God", "Jesus", "angels", or "guides", you are far more likely to trust them, submit, and do as you are told.
And if what many NDEs suggest is true, and you are encouraged or told to "go back", then you will likely agree to it without questioning it.
And that is how the cycle (of reincarnations) continues...!
Even as little children, we are bombarded with cartoons about,
Superman, Batman, Spiderman, you name it.. not to mention all the movies about Thor, Captain America, Iron man...
The list is endless, there are so many examples.
From a very young age but also during adulthood, we are being conditioned to look for salvation outside of ourselves, to believe that someone else will come and save the day.
It is presented as harmless entertainment, but the pattern it reinforces is always the same which is that the solution is never you, it is always something or someone above you.
Once you see it, you cannot unseen it.
Society programs people from every angle, every religion, the New Age, cartoons, movies, all pushing the same underlying message:
be obedient, look outside yourself, wait to be "saved"...
So even if you avoid one trap, it doesn't make much of a difference because there are other traps everywhere, all waiting for you to fall right back into the same pattern.
You know what i mean?
If you do not fall for religion and wait for God to save you, you fall for the New Age and wait for spirit guides, and if not that, there is always something else ready to take its place, same pattern, different label.
"They" want us to be obedient slaves, so if we want to get out of here we need to be the exact opposite...
Be sovereign...!
by Razerer92
March 24, 2026
from EscapingPrisonPlanet Website
Return Home
Return to Matrix
Return to Consciousness and Human Energy - Death - A Transition
Return to The Divine and Manipulative Extraterrestrials - The Harvest
Iran is 'Dangerous' and they Need to be Stopped? - Do you Believe It...?
Next time someone says that Iran is dangerous and they need to be stopped... some history to share:
1901:
A British businessman secures exclusive rights to Iran's oil. Iran gets almost nothing from its own resource.
1908:
Oil is struck. Anglo-Iranian Oil Company is formed.
It later becomes BP. The British Royal Navy converts from coal to oil, making Iranian petroleum a strategic military asset for the British Empire.
For the next 50 years, Iran's oil is extracted by a foreign corporation. Iran receives a fraction of the profits. Saudi Arabia negotiates a 50-50 profit split with ARAMCO.
Iran asks for the same terms. Britain refuses.
1951:
Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, nationalizes Iran's oil through a unanimous vote in parliament.
Completely legal. Completely constitutional.
His argument was simple:
this is our oil.
Britain responds with an international blockade.
No negotiation. No compromise. They want their oil back.
1953:
The CIA (Operation Ajax) and MI6 (Operation Boot) overthrow Mossadegh.
They bribe politicians, clerics, journalists, and military officers. They fund fake protests. They run disinformation campaigns through newspapers they secretly own.
MI6 operatives kidnap and murder Iran's chief of police and dump his body in public as a warning.
They reinstall the Shah - a monarch who serves Western oil interests.
The CIA officially acknowledged its role in 2013.
After the coup, BP retains a 40% stake. American oil companies including Exxon and Mobil get significant shares.
Iran's democratic government is gone. Its oil is back under foreign control.
1953-1979:
The Shah rules for 26 years as a Western-backed authoritarian.
His secret police, SAVAK, is trained by the CIA and Mossad.
SAVAK tortures and kills political dissidents systematically. Iran becomes one of the largest purchasers of American weapons.
The Shah lives in extraordinary luxury while much of the population remains poor.
During this entire period, Israel and Iran are close allies. SAVAK and Mossad share intelligence. Israel sells weapons to Iran.
Nobody in the West calls Iran a "terrorist state" because the dictator is their dictator...
1979:
The Iranian people overthrow the Shah in a popular revolution.
This is where your list begins - as if the revolution appeared out of nowhere, motivated by nothing but religious fanaticism...
Now let's talk about the US Embassy that was attacked
The US news likes to paint the 1979 hostage crisis as an unprovoked attack on America.
The revolutionaries seized the embassy because the last time there was a democratic movement in Iran, the CIA ran the coup to crush it from that same embassy.
They weren't being paranoid. They were being historically accurate.
Britannica's own assessment:
"It is generally agreed today that the 1953 coup sowed the seeds for the Islamic Revolution of 1979."
That's not a conspiracy theory. That's the encyclopedia...
Now let's ask a couple more Questions
Why are there U.S. military bases in Iraq?
Because the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003 on claims of 'weapons of mass destruction' that turned out to be false... Over a million Iraqi civilians died.
No American official was ever prosecuted.
Why is there conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon?
Because Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982 and occupied southern Lebanon for 18 years.
Why are Houthi rebels attacking ships?
Because a U.S.-backed Saudi coalition bombed Yemen for years, creating what the UN called "the world's worst humanitarian crisis."
Over 150,000 dead. Famine. Cholera outbreaks.
Why does Iran pursue nuclear capability?
Possibly because Israel has an undeclared nuclear arsenal estimated at 80-400 warheads, has never signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty, faces zero international inspections, and has never been sanctioned for it.
Iran signed the NPT. Iran agreed to inspections. Iran signed the nuclear deal in 2015. The U.S. pulled out of that deal in 2018.
Every single item on your list is framed as Iranian aggression against "the West."
But none of them exist without the West's 70-year campaign of overthrowing Iran's democracy, installing a dictator, extracting its oil, arming its neighbors, invading the countries on its borders, and maintaining military bases throughout the region.
Now trace who Benefits
The 1953 coup was about oil. BP and American oil companies got the oil.
The Shah's 26-year reign was about strategic positioning. The U.S. and Israel got a compliant ally on the Soviet border and in the Middle East.
The post-1979 framing of Iran as a "terrorist state" serves a specific function: it justifies permanent U.S. military presence in the Middle East, billions in annual arms sales to Saudi Arabia and Gulf states, and unconditional U.S. support for Israel's regional dominance.
Every "Iranian attack" on your list occurred in a country where the U.S. had no legal right to be in the first place:
Iraq, Syria, Jordan.
American troops are stationed across the Middle East not because those countries asked for protection from Iran, but because the U.S. positioned itself there to control the region's resources and protect its strategic architecture.
When someone punches you for 70 years - overthrows your government, installs a dictator, trains his secret police to torture your people, extracts your oil, invades the countries on your borders, surrounds you with military bases, and sanctions your economy into the ground - and then you punch back, the question isn't,
"why are you violent?..."
The question is:
who threw the first punch?
And who's been profiting from the fight ever since?
That's not a defense of the Iranian regime.
The theocracy that replaced the Shah has its own record of brutality against its own people, especially women. But that regime exists because the CIA destroyed Iran's democracy in 1953.
The West created the conditions for the very thing it now claims to oppose.
The history continues...
HAMAS (October 7, 2023)
"Hamas, to my great regret, is Israel's creation," said Avner Cohen, a former Israeli religious affairs official who worked in Gaza for more than two decades, to the Wall Street Journal in 2009.
Brigadier General Yitzhak Segev, who served as Israeli military governor in Gaza in the early 1980s, told the New York Times that he had helped finance the Palestinian Islamist movement as a "counterweight" to the PLO.
"The Israeli government gave me a budget," the retired brigadier general confessed, "and the military government gives to the mosques."
Initially, Hamas was discreetly supported by Israel, as a counter-balance to the secular Palestine Liberation Organization to prevent the creation of an independent Palestinian state.
And it didn't stop in the 1980s.
According to the New York Times, Israeli intelligence agents traveled into Gaza with a Qatari official carrying suitcases filled with cash to disperse money.
In 2015, Bezalel Smotrich, currently the finance minister in Netanyahu's government, summed up the strategy:
"The Palestinian Authority is a burden. Hamas is an asset."
Netanyahu told journalist Dan Margalit that it was important to keep Hamas strong, as a counterweight to the Palestinian Authority.
Having two strong rivals, including Hamas, would lessen pressure on him to negotiate toward a Palestinian state.
Netanyahu penned a letter to Qatar in 2018 asking the Qatari leadership to continue funding Hamas...
HEZBOLLAH (1983 Beirut bombings, kidnappings)
Hezbollah was formed in 1982 - the same year Israel invaded Lebanon.
It didn't exist before the invasion. Israel invaded Lebanon to destroy the PLO headquarters there. The invasion killed approximately 20,000 people, mostly civilians.
Hezbollah was born as a direct resistance movement to that invasion.
The 1983 Marine barracks bombing on the commenter's list killed 241 Americans.
But why were U.S. Marines in Lebanon?
Because the U.S. had intervened in the Lebanese Civil War, positioning itself as a participant in the conflict rather than a neutral peacekeeper.
The Marines were shelling Druze and Shia positions from naval vessels before the bombing.
IRAN'S PROXY NETWORK (Houthis, Kataib Hezbollah, militias in Iraq and Syria)
Every proxy on that list operates in a country where the U.S. or its allies intervened first.
Iraq - the U.S. invaded in 2003 on false WMD claims. Iranian-backed militias formed to resist the occupation.
Syria - the CIA ran Operation Timber Sycamore, spending billions arming Syrian rebels, many of whom were jihadists. Iran backed Assad. Both sides were proxies in someone else's war.
Yemen - the Houthis fight against a Saudi-led coalition that the U.S. armed and supported. The Saudi bombing campaign created what the UN called the world's worst humanitarian crisis.
***
The United States propaganda machine goes hard.
The enemy is not a republican or a democrat...
For all of history people knew their governments were evil.
Don't forget that it's true today...!
The enemy is not the one vilified by billionaire owned media dynasties...
by Andrew Sterling Ansley
March 27, 2026
from Facebook Website
Information sent by MJGdeA
Return Home
Return to Trump - Trump 2025
Return to Zionism and Israel - Zion and Iran
Return to The Actual Iran Case - The Beginning of World War III? - War against Iran 2026
1901:
A British businessman secures exclusive rights to Iran's oil. Iran gets almost nothing from its own resource.
1908:
Oil is struck. Anglo-Iranian Oil Company is formed.
It later becomes BP. The British Royal Navy converts from coal to oil, making Iranian petroleum a strategic military asset for the British Empire.
For the next 50 years, Iran's oil is extracted by a foreign corporation. Iran receives a fraction of the profits. Saudi Arabia negotiates a 50-50 profit split with ARAMCO.
Iran asks for the same terms. Britain refuses.
1951:
Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, nationalizes Iran's oil through a unanimous vote in parliament.
Completely legal. Completely constitutional.
His argument was simple:
this is our oil.
Britain responds with an international blockade.
No negotiation. No compromise. They want their oil back.
1953:
The CIA (Operation Ajax) and MI6 (Operation Boot) overthrow Mossadegh.
They bribe politicians, clerics, journalists, and military officers. They fund fake protests. They run disinformation campaigns through newspapers they secretly own.
MI6 operatives kidnap and murder Iran's chief of police and dump his body in public as a warning.
They reinstall the Shah - a monarch who serves Western oil interests.
The CIA officially acknowledged its role in 2013.
After the coup, BP retains a 40% stake. American oil companies including Exxon and Mobil get significant shares.
Iran's democratic government is gone. Its oil is back under foreign control.
1953-1979:
The Shah rules for 26 years as a Western-backed authoritarian.
His secret police, SAVAK, is trained by the CIA and Mossad.
SAVAK tortures and kills political dissidents systematically. Iran becomes one of the largest purchasers of American weapons.
The Shah lives in extraordinary luxury while much of the population remains poor.
During this entire period, Israel and Iran are close allies. SAVAK and Mossad share intelligence. Israel sells weapons to Iran.
Nobody in the West calls Iran a "terrorist state" because the dictator is their dictator...
1979:
The Iranian people overthrow the Shah in a popular revolution.
This is where your list begins - as if the revolution appeared out of nowhere, motivated by nothing but religious fanaticism...
Now let's talk about the US Embassy that was attacked
The US news likes to paint the 1979 hostage crisis as an unprovoked attack on America.
The revolutionaries seized the embassy because the last time there was a democratic movement in Iran, the CIA ran the coup to crush it from that same embassy.
They weren't being paranoid. They were being historically accurate.
Britannica's own assessment:
"It is generally agreed today that the 1953 coup sowed the seeds for the Islamic Revolution of 1979."
That's not a conspiracy theory. That's the encyclopedia...
Now let's ask a couple more Questions
Why are there U.S. military bases in Iraq?
Because the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003 on claims of 'weapons of mass destruction' that turned out to be false... Over a million Iraqi civilians died.
No American official was ever prosecuted.
Why is there conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon?
Because Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982 and occupied southern Lebanon for 18 years.
Why are Houthi rebels attacking ships?
Because a U.S.-backed Saudi coalition bombed Yemen for years, creating what the UN called "the world's worst humanitarian crisis."
Over 150,000 dead. Famine. Cholera outbreaks.
Why does Iran pursue nuclear capability?
Possibly because Israel has an undeclared nuclear arsenal estimated at 80-400 warheads, has never signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty, faces zero international inspections, and has never been sanctioned for it.
Iran signed the NPT. Iran agreed to inspections. Iran signed the nuclear deal in 2015. The U.S. pulled out of that deal in 2018.
Every single item on your list is framed as Iranian aggression against "the West."
But none of them exist without the West's 70-year campaign of overthrowing Iran's democracy, installing a dictator, extracting its oil, arming its neighbors, invading the countries on its borders, and maintaining military bases throughout the region.
Now trace who Benefits
The 1953 coup was about oil. BP and American oil companies got the oil.
The Shah's 26-year reign was about strategic positioning. The U.S. and Israel got a compliant ally on the Soviet border and in the Middle East.
The post-1979 framing of Iran as a "terrorist state" serves a specific function: it justifies permanent U.S. military presence in the Middle East, billions in annual arms sales to Saudi Arabia and Gulf states, and unconditional U.S. support for Israel's regional dominance.
Every "Iranian attack" on your list occurred in a country where the U.S. had no legal right to be in the first place:
Iraq, Syria, Jordan.
American troops are stationed across the Middle East not because those countries asked for protection from Iran, but because the U.S. positioned itself there to control the region's resources and protect its strategic architecture.
When someone punches you for 70 years - overthrows your government, installs a dictator, trains his secret police to torture your people, extracts your oil, invades the countries on your borders, surrounds you with military bases, and sanctions your economy into the ground - and then you punch back, the question isn't,
"why are you violent?..."
The question is:
who threw the first punch?
And who's been profiting from the fight ever since?
That's not a defense of the Iranian regime.
The theocracy that replaced the Shah has its own record of brutality against its own people, especially women. But that regime exists because the CIA destroyed Iran's democracy in 1953.
The West created the conditions for the very thing it now claims to oppose.
The history continues...
HAMAS (October 7, 2023)
"Hamas, to my great regret, is Israel's creation," said Avner Cohen, a former Israeli religious affairs official who worked in Gaza for more than two decades, to the Wall Street Journal in 2009.
Brigadier General Yitzhak Segev, who served as Israeli military governor in Gaza in the early 1980s, told the New York Times that he had helped finance the Palestinian Islamist movement as a "counterweight" to the PLO.
"The Israeli government gave me a budget," the retired brigadier general confessed, "and the military government gives to the mosques."
Initially, Hamas was discreetly supported by Israel, as a counter-balance to the secular Palestine Liberation Organization to prevent the creation of an independent Palestinian state.
And it didn't stop in the 1980s.
According to the New York Times, Israeli intelligence agents traveled into Gaza with a Qatari official carrying suitcases filled with cash to disperse money.
In 2015, Bezalel Smotrich, currently the finance minister in Netanyahu's government, summed up the strategy:
"The Palestinian Authority is a burden. Hamas is an asset."
Netanyahu told journalist Dan Margalit that it was important to keep Hamas strong, as a counterweight to the Palestinian Authority.
Having two strong rivals, including Hamas, would lessen pressure on him to negotiate toward a Palestinian state.
Netanyahu penned a letter to Qatar in 2018 asking the Qatari leadership to continue funding Hamas...
HEZBOLLAH (1983 Beirut bombings, kidnappings)
Hezbollah was formed in 1982 - the same year Israel invaded Lebanon.
It didn't exist before the invasion. Israel invaded Lebanon to destroy the PLO headquarters there. The invasion killed approximately 20,000 people, mostly civilians.
Hezbollah was born as a direct resistance movement to that invasion.
The 1983 Marine barracks bombing on the commenter's list killed 241 Americans.
But why were U.S. Marines in Lebanon?
Because the U.S. had intervened in the Lebanese Civil War, positioning itself as a participant in the conflict rather than a neutral peacekeeper.
The Marines were shelling Druze and Shia positions from naval vessels before the bombing.
IRAN'S PROXY NETWORK (Houthis, Kataib Hezbollah, militias in Iraq and Syria)
Every proxy on that list operates in a country where the U.S. or its allies intervened first.
Iraq - the U.S. invaded in 2003 on false WMD claims. Iranian-backed militias formed to resist the occupation.
Syria - the CIA ran Operation Timber Sycamore, spending billions arming Syrian rebels, many of whom were jihadists. Iran backed Assad. Both sides were proxies in someone else's war.
Yemen - the Houthis fight against a Saudi-led coalition that the U.S. armed and supported. The Saudi bombing campaign created what the UN called the world's worst humanitarian crisis.
***
The United States propaganda machine goes hard.
The enemy is not a republican or a democrat...
For all of history people knew their governments were evil.
Don't forget that it's true today...!
The enemy is not the one vilified by billionaire owned media dynasties...
by Andrew Sterling Ansley
March 27, 2026
from Facebook Website
Information sent by MJGdeA
Return Home
Return to Trump - Trump 2025
Return to Zionism and Israel - Zion and Iran
Return to The Actual Iran Case - The Beginning of World War III? - War against Iran 2026
"Protocols of the Elders of Zion", The Bible of Khazarian Mafia
Some time ago, Stan Monteith, a pioneer NWO researcher and broadcaster, found a typewritten copy of the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" in the papers of Col. Edward M. House at Yale University.
This seemed like confirmation of the widely held view that House (1858-1938) was a Rothschild agent.
House was an "adviser" to Woodrow Wilson and FDR. It makes sense that he would have a copy of the Blueprint for the New World Order in his possession. He probably referred to it while writing his political manifesto, "Philip Dru - Administrator." (1912)
The 99-page House typescript is a different English translation from the Victor Marsden translation, which is most commonly used. (I suspect "The Protocols" were originally written in French, originating in the Mizraim Lodge.)
So far, I have just compared the First Protocol (8 pages.)
The most obvious difference is the title.
Marsden's book is, "The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion."
The translation in House's possession is, "Protocols of the Meeting of the Zionist Men of Wisdom."
In this translation, "meeting" is singular and the "Elders" are clearly identified as "Zionists."
The significance is that "Zionist" used here is a movement for world domination, not one confined to establishing a Jewish homeland.
The second point of interest is a footnote in House's typescript that does not appear in the Marsden translation. In relation to "subjugating all governments to our super-government" there is an asterisk reference to "A.C. Shamakov, 'International Secret Government' Moscow, 1912."
This book is hard to find. It was sold for $805 by Christie's auction house in 1994, along with a few other Russian examples of Judaica. Interestingly,
Shamakov was not a Communist Jewish Mason of the kind that studied the "Protocols."
On the contrary, House's version references a notorious "anti Semite" a man whose career was devoted to exposing the Illuminati Jewish conspiracy.
His real name was A.S. Shmakov and he was a lawyer, author and member of the Duma. He became famous when he volunteered to help the prosecution in the famous Mendel Beilis case in 1913, where a group of Saint Petersburg Jews was accused of the ritual killing of a youth, Andrey Jushinsky.
It is puzzling that House's version of the Protocols would reference an opponent, unless the translation originated with the opposition, and came into House's possession.
This interpretation is supported by another footnote on the first page explaining that "The Goys = THE GENTILES."
If this version originated inside the lodge, they would not need this explanation.
MORE ON THE TRANSLATION
House's version is of great interest to scholars.
Here are some examples from the first Protocol.
Marsden: "our watchword is force and make-believe."
House: "our password is power and hypocrisy."
Marsden: "their youth has grown stupid on classicism"
House: "their young people are insensible to ought else than classism and early vice."
Marsden: "by the law of nature, right lies in force"
House: "according to the law of being, right is might."
Marsden: "The doctrine of squaring accounts is precisely as strong as the means of which it makes use."
House: "A doctrine of self-interest is as potent as are methods employed by it."
CONCLUSION
The "Protocols" is the master plan of the New World Order, and the most read book after the Bible. But unlike the Bible, which its seeks to overthrow, there has been little attention paid to the nuances of meaning found in the different translations.
These nuances are significant, as the above examples suggest.
Stan Monteith is selling photocopies of the House translation for $15 plus postage. His number at Radio Liberty is : 1-800-544-8927
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
July 15, 2010
from HenryMakow Website
The Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion
Files for the-protocols-of-the-learned-elders-of-zion-is-true
__ia_thumb.jpg 10-Dec-2024 02:11 13.5K
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion.epub 02-Nov-2025 11:55 592.1K
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion.pdf 10-Dec-2024 01:31 112.1M
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_chocr.html.gz 10-Dec-2024 01:58 2.8M
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_djvu.txt 10-Dec-2024 02:05 208.2K
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_djvu.xml 10-Dec-2024 02:01 2.7M
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_hocr.html 10-Dec-2024 02:00 4.9M
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_hocr_pageindex.json.gz 10-Dec-2024 02:03 884.0B
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_hocr_searchtext.txt.gz 10-Dec-2024 02:04 75.5K
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_jp2.zip (View Contents) 10-Dec-2024 01:38 23.6M
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_page_numbers.json 10-Dec-2024 02:06 12.1K
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_scandata.xml 10-Dec-2024 02:06 25.4K
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_text.pdf 10-Dec-2024 02:10 4.9M
the-protocols-of-the-learned-elders-of-zion-is-true_archive.torrent 02-Nov-2025 11:56 10.2K
the-protocols-of-the-learned-elders-of-zion-is-true_files.xml 02-Nov-2025 11:56 8.5K
the-protocols-of-the-learned-elders-of-zion-is-true_meta.sqlite 10-Dec-2024 01:32 20.0K
the-protocols-of-the-learned-elders-of-zion-is-true_meta.xml 02-Nov-2025 11:56 2.4K
__ia_thumb.jpg 10-Dec-2024 02:11 13.5K
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion.epub 02-Nov-2025 11:55 592.1K
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion.pdf 10-Dec-2024 01:31 112.1M
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_chocr.html.gz 10-Dec-2024 01:58 2.8M
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_djvu.txt 10-Dec-2024 02:05 208.2K
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_djvu.xml 10-Dec-2024 02:01 2.7M
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_hocr.html 10-Dec-2024 02:00 4.9M
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_hocr_pageindex.json.gz 10-Dec-2024 02:03 884.0B
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_hocr_searchtext.txt.gz 10-Dec-2024 02:04 75.5K
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_jp2.zip (View Contents) 10-Dec-2024 01:38 23.6M
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_page_numbers.json 10-Dec-2024 02:06 12.1K
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_scandata.xml 10-Dec-2024 02:06 25.4K
protocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion_text.pdf 10-Dec-2024 02:10 4.9M
the-protocols-of-the-learned-elders-of-zion-is-true_archive.torrent 02-Nov-2025 11:56 10.2K
the-protocols-of-the-learned-elders-of-zion-is-true_files.xml 02-Nov-2025 11:56 8.5K
the-protocols-of-the-learned-elders-of-zion-is-true_meta.sqlite 10-Dec-2024 01:32 20.0K
the-protocols-of-the-learned-elders-of-zion-is-true_meta.xml 02-Nov-2025 11:56 2.4K
Wednesday, April 8, 2026
EARTH LIBERATION
STAR NATION NEWS 109 SPECIAL EDITION ~ 30 03 2026
--CORROBORATING EVIDENCE: https://thewebmatrix.net/elenadanaan....
---WEBINARS: https://www.crowdcast.io/@elena-danaan
---TIMELINE OF EVENTS BY DAN WILLIS: https://thewebmatrix.net/
---MARTIAN CORRESPONDANCE WITH JEN HAN: https://www.elenadanaan.org/interstel...
---Find more information about the Star Nations in "ENCYCLOPEDIA GALACTICA" (volumes I & II ): https://www.elenadanaan.org/elena-dan...
---CONFERENCES: https://www.elenadanaan.org/internati...
BOOKS :
---"A GIFT FROM THE STARS" : https://www.elenadanaan.org/a-gift-fr...
---"WE WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN": https://www.elenadanaan.org/wewillnev...
---"THE SEEDERS ~ Return of the Gods": https://www.elenadanaan.org/the-seede...
---"AREA 51": https://www.elenadanaan.org/area-51-s...
---"KOLDAS": https://www.elenadanaan.org/elena-dan...
---"ENCYCLOPEDIA GALACTICA": https://www.elenadanaan.org/elena-dan...
---"RESILIENCE": https://www.elenadanaan.org/resilienc...
---SAGA SHANDORA: hhttps://www.elenadanaan.org/shandora
https://www.elenadanaan.org/
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)