A look at the origins, history and conspiracies behind the "Majestic 12", a clandestine group of military and corporate figureheads charged with reverse-engineering extraterrestrial technology.
This is the April 2025 ET Board Meeting between the Farsight remote
viewers and two AI extraterrestrials who explain the relationship
between AIs and biological extraterrestrials.
This is the first recorded
meeting between Farsight members and extraterrestrial AIs. The exact
date of the meeting is 23 April 2025.
India blames Pakistan for the killing of 26 tourists. But on city streets, Kashmiris are facing the brunt of Indians’ anger.
New Delhi, India –
Walking through the narrow and crowded lanes of Jalandhar, a city in
the northern state of Punjab, *Aasif Dar suddenly realised that “all
eyes were on me”.
And they weren’t friendly gazes.
“I felt like every single person in the crowd had vengeance in their eyes,” recalled Dar.
As Dar and a friend stopped by an ATM, two unknown persons
approached them, asking about their ethnicity. They panicked and ran
away. The next morning, on April 23, Dar left his house to buy milk.
“Three men saw me and hurled Islamophobic slurs,” said Dar. “One of them
shouted, ‘He is a Kashmiri, everything happens because of them.’”
On Tuesday, April 22, gunmen opened fire on tourists in Kashmir’s resort town of Pahalgam, killing 26 tourists and injuring a dozen others.
Yet, even as New Delhi has blamed Pakistan for the attack, which was
claimed by an armed group seeking secession from India, the killings
have also opened up the country’s religious and ethnic fault lines.
As Indian government forces continue to hunt for the attackers in
Kashmir’s dense jungles and mountains, Kashmiris living across India,
especially students, have reported heckling, harassment and threats by
far-right Hindu groups – or even their classmates.
From Uttarakhand, Punjab, to Uttar Pradesh, landlords are pushing
Kashmiri tenants out; and shopkeepers are refusing to trade with them.
Several Kashmiri students are sleeping at airports as they try to make
their way home.
Someone else carried out the deadly attack. “And we are now left here to pay the price,” said Dar.
‘Mistrust everywhere I look’
The disputed region of Kashmir is claimed in full, but ruled in parts, by both India and Pakistan.
New Delhi has accused Islamabad of indirect involvement in “cross-border terrorism”
and the Pahalgam attack. Pakistan refutes the allegations and says it
only provides moral and diplomatic support to Kashmiri nationalism. It
has said that India has not provided any evidence of Pakistan’s
involvement in the Pahalgam attack, which has left the nuclear-armed
neighbours locked in a tense standoff: New Delhi has walked out of a water-sharing treaty; both nations are expelling each other’s citizens and are scaling back the diplomatic strengths of their missions in each other’s capitals.
But inside India, Kashmiris are bearing the brunt of the anger over Tuesday’s attack.
Nearly a dozen Kashmiris who spoke with Al Jazeera, all on condition
of anonymity, said they have locked themselves inside their rooms in at
least seven cities of India, and avoid any outside contact, including
placing online orders or booking cabs.
Dar is a second-semester student of anaesthesia and operation theatre
technology in Jalandhar. It is the first time Dar has left his parents,
and Kashmir, to pursue higher education.
“There are no opportunities in Kashmir, and I want to study hard for
my future,” he said in a phone interview. “If I do well here, I will be
able to support my family.”
But the reality is sobering for him. With his term exams breathing
down his neck, Dar said he has grown anxious and depressed. “I have
forgotten everything that I have learnt in these months,” he said.
“There is a constant uncertainty – I may stay non-attendant [at class];
go back to my home, I don’t know, my head just does not work.”
“There is mistrust everywhere I look,” he said. “We are also cursed because our face and features give away our ethnicity.”
Soon after the attack, multiple survivor accounts emerged, suggesting
that the gunmen separated the attacked tourists by religion. Of the 26
people killed, 25 were Hindu men.
But largely missed in the tornado of anti-Kashmiri and anti-Muslim
hate that has taken over Indian social media since Tuesday, was the
identity of the 26th person killed: a Kashmiri Muslim man who tried to
stop the attackers from murdering the tourists.
“Today’s India runs high on xenophobic propaganda and that has been
unleashed for some years now; most of it is against Muslims,” said
Sheikh Showkat, a political analyst and academic based in Kashmir.
“Kashmiris bear a double weight: of being a Kashmiri – and a Muslim,” he said. “They are always the easy targets.”
Kashmiri men hold candles and placards as they condemn the tourists’ killing during a protest in Srinagar. [Dar Yasin/AP]
‘Give this treatment to Kashmiri Muslims’
Nearly 350km (217 miles) away from Jalandhar, in Dehradun, the
capital of Uttarakhand state, the leader of a far-right Hindutva outfit
issued a chilling warning on Tuesday.
“We won’t wait for the government to take action … Kashmiri Muslims,
leave by 10am, else you will face action you can’t imagine,” Lalit
Sharma, the leader of the Hindu Raksha Dal said in a video statement.
“Tomorrow, all our workers will leave their homes to give this treatment
to Kashmiri Muslims.”
Hindus hold posters during a protest in Mumbai on April 24 [Indranil Mukherjee/AFP]
Similar warnings were soon hitting the social media feed of *Mushtaq Wani, a 29-year-old Kashmiri student in the city.
Pursuing his master’s in library science, Wani, who is older than
most Kashmiri students in the city, started receiving panicked calls
from others. “We took the threats seriously,” he said.
There is a history of violence against Kashmiris in the region: soon
after the deadly suicide bombing attack in 2019 in Pulwama, which killed
at least 40 paramilitary personnel, Kashmiri students were hunted down
in Dehradun, beaten up, and forced back home. Several did not return to
the city.
“This is what our life is like,” Wani lamented. “This happens again
and again – why cannot India finish the militants in one go? They have
so many troopers and the [number of] militants [is] so less … someone
kills someone and our lives are upended.”
Since the threats, Wani has coordinated at least 15 students’ travel
back to Kashmir. As for himself, he is sitting tight, locked inside a
friend’s home, preparing for his term exams from next week. “We are
scared and do not feel safe, but if I miss my exams, I stand to lose a
lot,” he said.
However, Wani said, he felt a little relieved after the police
arrested Sharma, the far-right leader, and assured Kashmiri students
that authorities would ensure their safety.
‘Pahalgam changed everything’
After videos of frightened Kashmiris, and of their physical assault
in nearly half a dozen Indian cities, hit social media, Omar Abdullah,
the newly elected chief minister of Jammu and Kashmir, urged other state
chiefs on X to ensure the safety of Kashmiris.
“I request the people of India not to consider the people of Kashmir
as their enemies,” Abdullah later told reporters. “What happened did not
take place with our consent. We are not the enemies.”
In 2019, the Indian government unilaterally revoked the region’s
semi-autonomous status and divided the former state into two union
territories – Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh – amid a communications
blackout. Even though Abdullah came to power last year after the first
state legislature elections in a decade, the Jammu and Kashmir
government today has far less power than any other provincial
administration, with New Delhi largely in charge.
*Umer Parray, a resident of south Kashmir, has been studying pharmacy
in Jammu for five years. Muslim-majority Kashmir and Hindu-majority
Jammu are two administrative blocks of the union territory.
Until Pahalgam, life had been fine in Jammu, he said. “But the Pahalgam attack changed everything,” he said.
Earlier, Parray would go on late-night walks with friends to ice
cream shops. Since the attack, Parray has not left his home in a
neighbourhood where many Kashmiri residents live.
The night after the attack, dozens of young men rode through the
neighbourhood on bikes – blaring horns and shouting “Jai Shri Ram”,
historically a religious chant and greeting that far-right groups have,
in recent years, turned into a war cry.
Later, a video emerged of men beating and running after Kashmiri students in his adjacent lane.
“We have never seen anything like this,” he said.
* First names of Kashmiri students have been changed to protect their identities, amid fear of retributive attacks.
The Canadian government is stepping into bold new territory with the
development of a groundbreaking mRNA-based aerosol vaccine known as
“AeroVax.” Designed to address vaccine hesitancy, AeroVax aims to
simplify immunization by eliminating needles entirely—instead, it’s
inhaled as a fine mist.
Unlike traditional vaccines administered
by injection, AeroVax is delivered through the air and absorbed through
the lungs, offering a needle-free alternative that could transform
public health strategies.
Developed by researchers at McMaster
University—backed by funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation—the AeroVax project has now received an $8 million boost from
the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) as it moves into its
next phase of clinical testing.
Scientists behind the
experimental mRNA-based Covid “vaccine” known as Serova are promoting a
new approach to immunization—delivering it as a simple nasal spray.
The implications of aerosol-based vaccines go far beyond individual
use. With technology like AeroVax, the potential exists to disperse the
vaccine through the atmosphere, enabling mass immunization on a scale
never seen before.
Such a method could theoretically “vaccinate”
entire cities or regions simultaneously—without the need for personal
appointments, needles, or even individual awareness. In this scenario,
public consent could be bypassed entirely, raising pressing questions
about autonomy, ethics, and transparency in public health.
Concerns surrounding inhaled mRNA “vaccines” have been echoed by numerous experts as development continues to accelerate.
“When you put the pieces of the puzzle together, a disturbing picture
emerges,” cautioned Dr. Joseph Mercola in 2023, when the technology
first began gaining traction.
Slay News was among the first to
spotlight the emerging trend, reporting on the launch of Phase 1 trials
for inhaled Covid vaccines that year.
Initial studies in mice
produced results that had researchers proclaiming the potential for a
game-changing breakthrough—suggesting this innovative delivery method
could completely redefine how vaccines are administered in the future.
The first human trials of the experimental vaccine saw 36 volunteers take part in the groundbreaking study.
Researchers reported that the Phase 1 trials were completed without any
serious side effects, marking a promising early step in the development
of this new delivery method.
Building on the momentum of the initial success, researchers are now fast-tracking into Phase 2 trials.
They’re actively seeking 350 volunteers to participate in the next
stage—a rigorous, randomized, double-blind study designed to further
test the safety and effectiveness of the inhaled vaccine.
In the
upcoming trial, 75 percent of participants will receive the actual
vaccine candidate, while the remaining volunteers will be given a
placebo.
The two inhaled Covid vaccine prototypes—named Tri:ChAd and Tri:HuAd—were first developed in 2021 and represent a new frontier in respiratory immunization.
Much like traditional mRNA shots, both versions of the AeroVax use a
form of the Covid virus’s spike protein to trigger an immune response,
but deliver it through a completely needle-free, airborne method.
Both versions of the AeroVax vaccine—Tri:ChAd and Tri:HuAd—were
developed using HEK293 fetal cell lines, a common cell culture
originally derived from kidney tissue of an aborted fetus in the
Netherlands during the 1970s.
According to the full research abstract, “Tri:HuAd was packaged and rescued in HEK293 cells through a two-plasmid co-transfection system.”
Despite the ethical debate surrounding the use of fetal cell lines,
McMaster University reports that pre-clinical trials in animals have
already delivered striking results—showing that the inhaled aerosol
vaccine generates a significantly stronger immune response than
traditional injections.
McMaster University attributes the
enhanced effectiveness of the inhaled vaccine to its ability to directly
target the upper respiratory tract—the primary entry point for airborne
viruses.
At the same time, momentum is building in the U.S.,
where the FDA has granted Fast Track Designation to a new
self-amplifying “replicon” mRNA vaccine aimed at combating the H5N1 bird
flu.
The vaccine, ARCT-2304, is being developed by Arcturus
Therapeutics—a Bill Gates–funded biotech firm focused on cutting-edge
mRNA technology. Notably, one of the company’s senior advisors, Dr.
Peter A. Patriarca, is a former CDC and FDA official who also serves as
an advisor to the Gates Foundation, highlighting the deep
interconnections shaping the future of vaccine innovation.
As previously reported by Slay News,
the new “self-amplifying” or “replicon” mRNA vaccines are designed to
do more than just deliver genetic instructions—they actually replicate
inside the body, continuously producing more mRNA after entering cells.
Dubbed “replicon” vaccines for this very reason, the technology
represents a major leap in how vaccines function—but it’s also sparked
intense global backlash. Experts and citizens alike have voiced serious
concerns over the implications of a vaccine that keeps reproducing
within the human body.
Still, despite the growing outcry, federal
health agencies are pushing full steam ahead with the development of
these next-gen injections, accelerating trials and approvals in an
effort to bring them to market.
Nicole Schwab, the daughter of World Economic Forum
co-founder Klaus, is extensively co-operating with prosecutors in the
crimes against humanity case against key figures of the global elite,
sparking fear in the WEF, the UN, and the WHO that their diplomatic
immunity is about to be revoked and arrest warrants issued.
Behind the scenes, the so-called untouchables are panicking.
Investigations once thought impossible are in full swing. Prosecutors
are circling. The illusion of immunity is cracking, and whispers inside
the International Criminal Court say we’re on the brink of Nuremberg 2.0. Real names. Real trials. Real consequences.
The globalist elite have made the last five years hell for humanity
but we have held strong, maintained our dignity, and exposed their
deceptions, one after the other. Our abusers have been backed into a
corner and now they are being forced to admit to crimes they have
committed. They want us to forgive and forget.
The ship is sinking. The rats are turning on each other. And Klaus? He just dove overboard.
Schwab shocked the globalist establishment earlier this week with the
sudden announcement of his immediate resignation from the WEF — the
very empire he built over five decades.
But then came the real kicker… The very next day, whispers became headlines: Schwab is officiallyunder investigation.
And folks, it’s not just a slap on the wrist.
The probe is heating up — fast. Allegations of governance failures.
Financial misconduct. WEF funds funneled into luxury perks, including —
get this — massages and spa treatments for elite insiders.
All while Klaus crisscrossed the globe in private jets, sipping
champagne in Davos, and lecturing you about reducing your carbon
footprint and your future life in a 15 minute city.
The mainstream media? They’re acting stunned. Like this all came out of nowhere.
But here at TPV, we’re not buying the act.
We’ve been tracking these developments for years — reporting what they wouldn’t touch. Our sources? Better. Our reach? Deeper.
We knew the walls were closing in.
This investigation isn’t just about misuse of funds or shady
boardroom deals. No — this is the tip of a much darker iceberg. One that
stretches back to the origins of the WEF, the global depopulation
agenda, the fake pandemic, and the digital prison they tried to trap us
in.
And here’s the twist they never saw coming…
The rats are turning on each other as the ship sinks—scrambling to
save themselves while the rest of the world finally catches up to the
truth.
One of those rats?
Nicole Schwab—yes, that Schwab—daughter of Klaus Schwab himself, the
architect of the WEF, is “singing like a bird,” cooperating fully with
international investigators.
According to prosecutors, her testimony could be the Rosetta Stone of the globalist takedown.
Not just about the pandemic and the legal cover-up… but about the endgame: a systematic plan to depopulate the earth.
Billions of souls—culled not just through forced injections, but
through decades of contamination in our food, water, air, and the threat
of more engineered pandemics to come.
What Nicole has revealed behind closed doors is beyond chilling. It’s
methodical. Coordinated. And backed by hard data—data she claims was
stored in secret WEF servers, and distributed through quiet backchannels
to a network of loyal governments and institutions.
We’ll get into the explosive details in just a moment… But before we
do, you need to understand — Nicole Schwab isn’t the only one breaking
ranks.
There’s another name you need to know. Meet Pascal Najadi.
His father, Hussein Najadi, co-founded the World Economic
Forum with Klaus Schwab back in 1971. Ten years later, Hussein walked
away in disgust—calling the WEF’s vision dystopian, anti-human, and
criminal.
Now Pascal is picking up the torch—and throwing it straight into the heart of the globalist machine.
He’s handed over boxes—literal boxes—of records: internal
memos, emails, data logs, and private communications from his father’s
archives. Documents that spell doom for the WEF, the WHO, GAVI, and the
entire Geneva-based global control complex.
As Pascal puts it, “The devil lives in Geneva.”
And if you think he’s bluffing, think again.
It was Pascal Najadi who led the legal assault that brought down
Swiss Prime Minister Alain Berset—the face of Switzerland’s COVID
crackdown. Berset has since resigned in disgrace. His official plans?
“No plans except for yoga,” he says.
He can do all the downward dogs he wants—cagedin a prison cell where he belongs.
But Pascal’s not done. Far from it. He’s gunning for bigger fish. The
UN. The WHO. The WEF. He’s working to strip their diplomatic
immunity—an immunity that’s protected them for decades from prosecution
for crimes that defy imagination.
And with Nicole Schwab talking, and Pascal Najadi digging, it’s only getting worse for them.
They called it the Great Reset. They told us it was about “building
back better.” But what they didn’t tell us… was that their idea of
“better” meant billions of us gone.
The Covid plandemic was never about public health. It was the
trigger. The catalyst. The manufactured crisis that would allow
unelected global bodies like the WHO to seize unprecedented legal
powers—while the WEF and UN moved to finalize their dream of a One World
Government.
But we the people stood firm.
Through censorship. Coercion. Lockdowns. Mandates. Gaslighting. The most coordinated psychological operation in modern history—we refused to bow.
And now, the empire is crumbling. The lies are unraveling. And the self-proclaimed masters of our future?
The ship is taking on water. The rats are fighting. The lies are exposed. And the age of elite impunity?
It’s over.
As a WEF whistleblower reveals, it’s carnage backstage at the WEF,
and the rats are fighting among themselves to save their own skin.
Geneva may be the headquarters of the globalist elite, but the crime scene extends around the entire world.
And we won’t rest until justice is served and a reckoning is delivered.
Take New Zealand, for example. Jacinda Ardern ruled over one of the
most corrupt WEF-infiltrated vassal states during her time in office,
and the fingerprints of the global elite are all over the crime scene.
Former New Zealand TV presenter Liz Gunn published an update
about one medical clinic in New Zealand where 30 people received a
Covid injection on one day and all 30 of these people died, within the
same close time-frame.
Mainstream media would like you to believe this is just another “coincidence.”
Jacinda Ardern’s government knew that the jabs were poisonous, and yet they pushed them on the public regardless.
Meanwhile, Ardern was gaslighting the people she was supposed to be serving, telling them to trust the government as their “only source of truth.”
If you still don’t understand the forces tightening their grip on our
civilization — the ones rewriting reality in real time, erasing truth,
and enslaving minds — then there’s nothing more I can say.
But if you’re here, listening now… I know you do get it.
You feel it. Just like we do.
That’s why you’re tuned in. That’s why more and more people are
waking up. The illusion is cracking. The elites are running scared. And
now, more than ever, we need your voice.
The first nuclear weapons were successfully tested in the 1940s and
have been designed with increasing sophistication and lethality ever
since. They allow great powers to dominate smaller ones. They also risk
the lives of everyone on the planet as even a ‘small’ nuclear exchange
by accident or war could trigger a catastrophic, crop-killing nuclear
winter. Yet, since the 1940s, military personnel and investigators have
raised concerns in secret about unidentified flying objects (UFOs) in or
around sensitive nuclear weapons installations.
Robert Hastings is a world-renowned expert on the subject, having written the book UFOs & Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites, and produced the documentary UFOs and Nukes: The Secret Link Revealed. We asked for his thoughts on this important topic.
TIM COLES (TC): Tell us a bit about your background and how you became interested in UFOs and nukes.
Robert Hastings
ROBERT HASTINGS (RH):
My interest in the topic of UFO activity at nuclear weapons sites began
in March 1967, when I was a teenager living in Montana. Although I was
never in the military myself, my father, Senior Master Sergeant Robert
E. Hastings, was stationed at Malmstrom Air Force Base, where 200
nuclear missiles were deployed in the surrounding countryside. After
witnessing a radar tracking of five unknown aerial craft at the base air
traffic control tower, where I worked as a janitor three nights a week
after high school, I excitedly told my dad about the incident. He
subsequently made inquiries at his workplace – the main radar facility
on base – and was told that five UFOs had indeed been tracked by
multiple radars that night. Moreover, he was told, they had been
manoeuvring near nuclear missile sites southeast of Malmstrom. When my
dad later conveyed all of that to me, I was hooked! UFOs are real?! They’re flying around our ICBMs?! Wow!
Years
later, in 1973, I read a magazine article by Dr J. Allen Hynek – the
Air Force’s civilian, scientific UFO consultant – in which he openly
discussed UFO incursions at nuclear missile sites at another base,
Minot, in North Dakota. At that point, I knew that the situation at
Malmstrom had definitely been real and quite serious. Shortly
thereafter, at first to satisfy my curiosity, I began seeking out and
interviewing Air Force veterans to learn all I could about UFOs’
apparent interest in nukes. Over time – 46 years and counting – more
than 160 of those individuals have told me about their personal
involvement in such incidents.
A
drawing from a declassified US Air Force report, made by an
unidentified missile security policeman at Minot AFB, North Dakota,
relating to a UFO incursion in August 1966.
TC: Why do you think that UFOs at nuclear weapons sites, as opposed to say non-nuclear military installations, are so important?
RH: Nuclear weapons have fundamentally changed the nature of warfare, given their nearly unbelievable destructive power
and ability to radioactively poison the environment on a planetary
scale. As we all know, during the Cold War the US and the USSR
effectively held humanity hostage with their unending, nuclear
sabre-rattling. The Cuban Missile Crisis, in 1962, demonstrated just how
fragile our collective security really was, and how quickly a
potentially civilisation-ending conflict might erupt. Apparently,
someone else – an outside third party possessing revolutionary aerial
craft – became interested in this existential situation and, at some
point, began intervening in a limited, covert manner. Dozens of US Air
Force veterans – most of whom were initially interviewed by me – have
now openly discussed UFOs tampering with American ICBMs, rendering them
temporarily inoperable. Documents smuggled out of Russia, in 1993,
confirm that similar incidents occurred in the Soviet Union in the
1980s.
So, for whatever reason, the outside third party – which I
believe to be aliens from another world – surreptitiously made their
presence known to the superpowers’ military leaders during a dangerous
period in history, perhaps as a heavy hint or a warning: “Hey, humans!
Nukes pose an unprecedented threat to your species and your planet. Get
rid of them!” But I am, of course, speculating. Regardless, the now
well-documented UFO incidents at our ICBM sites are longstanding,
widespread and, I am told by my sources, ongoing.
TC: You
say that the UFOs are intelligently operated, but is it possible that
they are unexplained terrestrial phenomena such as electromagnetic
lights or some kind of as-yet undiscovered lifeform living at high
altitudes?
RH: If one reviews the eyewitness
reports relating to the nuclear missile cases, it is immediately
apparent that they involved unknown aerial craft of some kind. Go to www.ufohastings.com/documents
and read the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) log
entries relating to the incidents at Malmstrom AFB in November 1975. For
example, “The [Launch Control Facility] at Harlowton, Montana, observed
an object which emitted a light which illuminated the site driveway.”
Or, “[Missile Site] L-1 reports that the object to their northeast seems
to be issuing a black object from it, tubular in shape.” Or,
“[Malmstrom Command Post] reports UFO southeast of Lewistown, orange
white disc object.” Or, “L-5 reported object increased in speed – high
velocity, raised in altitude and now cannot tell the object from stars.”
And then there is this entry, “From four different points: Observed
objects and fighters; when fighters arrived in the area, the lights went
out; when fighters departed, the lights came back on.” In other words,
as security personnel at four different locations watched, the UFOs
played cat-and-mouse with two F-106 jet fighters that had been launched
to chase them, extinguishing their illumination as the aircraft
approached their position and re-illuminating themselves after the
fighters returned to base.
And I might add, the only reason jets
were scrambled is because the UFOs were tracked on the base’s radar,
just as any non-Stealth aircraft would be. This is only one of dozens of
declassified documents that summarise similar incidents at other bases’
missile sites, or at nuclear weapons storage facilities. So, no, the
UFOs themselves are not some undiscovered life form; the objects look
like machines, act like machines, and are undoubtedly piloted or
remotely controlled by someone who, in this instance, reacted to the
attempted intercept of them by US Air Force fighters by taking evasive
actions.
Are the craft terrestrial in origin? The first known UFO
sightings at a nuclear facility occurred in January 1945, seven months
before the atomic bombings in Japan. Declassified US Army documents
confirm three separate incursions of unknown aircraft, which were
tracked on radar, that hovered over the plutonium production plant known
as the Hanford Site, in Washington State. US Navy fighters based nearby
actually chased the objects. In 2009, I interviewed one of the pilots,
Bud Clem, who told me that each UFO looked like “a bright ball of fire…
so bright that you could hardly look directly at it.” The unidentified
aerial craft easily outran the propeller-driven F6F Hellcat fighters
sent up to pursue them.
Now, is there any credible evidence that
any country on Earth was flying such an aircraft in 1945? No, there
isn’t. Despite the exotic claims one sees on the internet, there is no
verifiable information confirming that the Nazis manufactured a
functional flying saucer. Nevertheless, someone was operating one – or, at least, a self-illuminated flying sphere – at the Hanford plant before the end of the war.
Illustration
from the film UFOs and Nukes: The Secret Link Revealed of a UFO
directing a beam of light onto a Minuteman missile silo near Ellsworth
AFB, South Dakota, in 1967, as described by retired US Air Force launch
officer Major Gaylan King.
I again
maintain that the UFOs seen at nuclear sites – from 1945 to the present
day – are technologically superior vehicles being operated by some third
party. According to the radar data, they can hover, perform tremendous
accelerations, make instantaneous right-angle turns, and fly thousands
of miles per hour. There might possibly be some secret, recently
developed, ultra-sophisticated US aerial craft hidden at Area 51 capable
of doing some or all of those things, but there sure as hell wasn’t any
such airplane flying during World War II, or above the ICBM sites in
Montana in the 1960s and ‘70s. And remember, we now know that the
Soviets were being subjected to UFO incursions at their missile sites as
well, some involving systems disruptions. We can’t point the finger at
the Russians when attempting to explain the events at Malmstrom. No, those unidentified aerial craft were clearly not being operated by any government on Earth. So who does that leave us?
TC: What’s really impressive about your book UFOs & Nukes
is your reliance on primary documentation: first-hand eyewitness
accounts, military documents, FBI memos, and so on. But if I were in
government counterintelligence, I would try to neutralise the
anti-nuclear weapons movement by having people believe that some outside
force is looking after us by sabotaging nukes. How do you check that
military and other documents are not just disinformation?
RH: Respectfully,
you misunderstand the situation. No military or intelligence group,
hidden or not, was actively promoting the “UFOs are Here to Save Us”
narrative by disseminating data that would further your hypothetical
disinformation ploy. On the contrary, the documents confirming UFO
activity at nuclear weapons sites were jealously guarded and only
forcibly released to researchers via the Freedom of Information Act.
Sometimes, decades passed before they became available to the public.
Similarly, all of my US military witnesses only went public with their
accounts after I implored them to do so. Like me, they believe that
Americans – and the rest of humanity – deserve to know the truth about
the UFO reality and their link to nuclear weapons.
The suggestion
that the US government has been releasing bogus information to further a
false history of events to influence public opinion in some manner is
simply untenable. Actually, over time, the US Air Force has been doing
the exact opposite, steadfastly claiming that UFOs don’t exist, even
though they are secretly aware of, and are extremely concerned about,
the nuclear cases. The last incident that I’ve heard about occurred at a
Malmstrom-operated missile site in January 2018, so the situation is
still active.
Importantly, at the present time, we have no
assurance that the disruptive activity at ICBM sites – UFOs tampering
with our missiles – necessarily indicates that whomever is operating the
craft is “looking after us,” as you put it. Other scenarios can be
advanced to explain what has been reported by the veterans whom I’ve
interviewed. For example, it’s entirely possible that the UFO beings
have some nefarious plan
for humans, even an invasion of Earth, and are investigating whether
they can disarm us before they strike. I don’t think that’s even
remotely true, but we can’t rule it out at the moment given the limited
evidence in our possession.
TC: Can you tell us
more about the 160 eyewitnesses: their rank, how you approached them or
vice versa, and how the famous Press Club conference in 2010 was
arranged?
The
27 September 2010 UFOs and Nukes press conference in Washington D.C.
during which seven USAF veterans discussed their involvement in nuclear
weapons-related UFO incidents.
RH: My
sources are mostly US Air Force veterans, although a handful were in
the Army or Navy, and range from low-level airmen to colonels. Usually,
they worked with or guarded nuclear weapons, but some were radar
operators, counterintelligence personnel, or pilots. In every case, they
directly witnessed or were involved in follow-up activities related to
UFO incursions at ICBM sites, missile warhead or bomb storage
facilities, nuclear materials production sites or weapons test areas.
In
the 1970s and 80s, I asked every pertinent military veteran I
encountered if they had any information they would be willing to share.
From the mid-1990s onward, I’ve used the internet to locate potential
witnesses who are members of Air Force alumni groups, who can be
contacted via email. In other cases, the veterans had attended my
lectures and approached me afterward or read one of my articles or my
book, and subsequently contacted me. Not surprisingly, most of the
individuals whom I randomly approached over the years had no knowledge
of UFO incidents at the bases where they worked. However, slowly but
surely, I amassed a body of testimony from scores of veterans who knew
about such incidents, occurring from the 1950s onward. I always secured
their military history record, called a DD214, before interviewing them,
to confirm that they had indeed been missile officers or missile
guards, and so on. In other words, all of my sources are vetted.
Regarding
the 2010 press conference, one of the veterans, former Minuteman
missile launch officer Captain Bob Salas – whose ten missiles were shut
down by a UFO at Malmstrom AFB in 1967 – and I decided to try to get the
media’s attention by co-hosting the event. CNN streamed it live and a
number of major US news organisations covered it as well, as did several
in foreign countries. I think we succeeded in our efforts to get some
publicity for the UFO-nukes topic. But, as is the case with most news
stories, it faded quickly and had no lasting impact on public
perceptions, at least to any significant degree.
TC: What is the most extraordinary case discussed in your book?
RH: Another former Air Force missile launch officer, Captain David Schuur, revealed his involvement in an ICBM-activation incident at Minot AFB, North Dakota, in 1967. His security personnel
reported seeing a bright aerial object moving from missile to missile,
among the ten that he controlled. Meanwhile, down in the underground
launch capsule, Schuur was horrified to see that the ICBMs began going
into launch mode, one by one, just as the UFO hovered over a given
missile. He had to flip an “Inhibit Switch” to deactivate the countdown
in each one. This type of incident was also reported by another former
launch officer, Captain Larry Manross, who witnessed an identical event
at Minot on a different occasion. Moreover, one of the Soviet
UFO-related documents smuggled out of Russia by investigative reporter
George Knapp, in 1993, confirms such an incident occurring at a missile
base in Soviet Ukraine in October 1982.
Still-frames
from a motion picture film of UFOs hovering over the Manzano Weapons
Storage Area, at Kirtland AFB, New Mexico, in 1980. Taken by Dr Paul
Bennewitz.
Now, I don’t think that
those aboard the UFOs were trying to start World War III by launching
the superpowers’ ICBMs; more likely they were activating the missiles to
see how the systems worked – assuming that they had the ability to
monitor them remotely – probably knowing that the launch officers could
disrupt the countdowns if they needed to do so in an emergency
situation. Or perhaps the entities merely wished to scare the hell out
of the military in both countries, in effect sending the message that
they could control the ICBMs if they so chose. But I obviously don’t
know the reason for the missile activations and am of course
speculating.
TC: Please tell us about your film UFOs and Nukes: The Secret Link Revealed. How did it come about and what is the strongest evidence in the film?
RH: A
wealthy benefactor provided the funding for the film. Between 2008 and
2015, I had declined offers to participate in 18 different UFO programs
on American, British, Canadian and French television
because I would have had no control over how my material was presented.
When broadcast, I saw that most of those shows were factually
inaccurate and sensationalised, just as I predicted. I didn’t want to
lend my work
to a dumbed-down presentation on UFOs meant to entertain the public.
When I mentioned all of this to my benefactor, he generously gave me the
money to make my own film. I’m quite happy with the result.
As
far as the most important case referenced in the film, I would say that
the Big Sur Incident is unmatched for its shocking nature and historic
significance. Two former US Air Force officers, Drs. Bob Jacobs and
Florenz Mansmann, say that a telescopic motion picture camera
inadvertently caught a UFO on film during a missile test launch at
Vandenberg AFB, California, in 1964. Analysis of the film confirmed that
a domed, disc-shaped craft manoeuvred near the missile’s dummy nuclear
warhead in flight
and then shot it down with weaponised beams of light! All of this was
clearly visible when the film was analysed frame-by-frame with a
magnifier. They say that the amazing motion picture was quickly
confiscated by the CIA. Debunkers have unsuccessfully attempted to
discredit the case by misstating the facts, but the available evidence
substantiates that the event actually took place. Apparently, the
entities operating the UFOs can not only tamper with the ICBMs in their
underground silos but can also disrupt them in mid-flight. This is an
incredible revelation!
TC: Have you been
threatened or intimidated for the work that you’re doing? If so, what
forms have they taken and who do you think is responsible?
RH: Yes,
someone has been trying to intimidate me via my telephone for years.
Often, when speaking with a military veteran about his particular UFO
incident, shortly after I hang up I get a second, mysterious call where
the person says nothing but breathes heavily into the phone before
hanging up. I gather that they – whoever “they” are – want me to know
they are keeping an eye on me and know to whom I am talking. This kind
of harassment has happened dozens of times and has been going on since
1982. I suspect that the CIA is responsible but can’t prove that.
Furthermore, emails between a given veteran and myself often disappear
in cyberspace. We later discover, via follow-up phone calls, that our
correspondence to each other never arrived. This happens routinely,
always involving persons who witnessed UFO activity at nuclear weapons
sites and is clearly suspicious. I knew that my activities would incur
the displeasure of one or more US government agencies so none of this
was unexpected. It’s so frequent that I’m used to it and not bothered by
it these days. I just keep moving forward.
TC: What projects are you working on at the moment?
RH:
I suspect that my answer will make some persons reading this very
uneasy. The fact is, in addition to my research activities and public
speaking relating to the UFO-Nukes connection, I have had, over the past
31 years, a series of unsettling-to-terrifying encounters with what I
have come to believe are non-human entities. In other words, I am an experiencer or,
stated more dramatically, an alien abductee. I wish this were not the
case and deeply regret that this “thing” has entered my life. Whether it
is a consequence of my investigations or some other factor is unknown,
but I am convinced that these encounters are physical in nature and not
merely misinterpreted prosaic events, or due to an overactive
imagination, or the result of sleep paralysis – all theories advanced by
the sceptics to explain away the abduction phenomenon.
Moreover,
seven of the 160-plus veterans whom I’ve interviewed have revealed
their own face-to-face alien encounters to me. Yes, I understand that
all of this is rather bizarre and hard to believe, nevertheless it is
unfortunately quite real. After decades of secrecy I have now “come out”
about my secret life in a new book, Confession: Our Hidden Alien Encounters Revealed,
co-written with Dr Bob Jacobs who witnessed the Big Sur UFO incident
mentioned earlier. In the early 1980s, he began having entity encounters
as well. When I learned this fact in 2012, we began updating each other
after our independent visitation/abduction experiences, which are
ongoing.
Finally, in early 2019, Jacobs and I decided to go
public regarding all of this, even though we knew that our credibility
would be negatively impacted and that some people – who had previously
been interested in, and believed, our revelations regarding UFO
incursions at nuclear weapons sites – would now recoil in sceptical
disbelief at our new revelations. But it is what it is, and these
strange, frightening experiences are continuing and obviously beyond our
control. Openly talking about them, however belatedly, is no different
than our previous efforts to publicly divulge the hidden nuclear
weapons-related cases. Although not yet recognised as valid by most
scientists and much of the public, the alien abduction phenomenon is
real, global, and tremendously important. That these non-human entities
are somehow part of humankind’s overall future seems clear to
experiencers; one day it will undoubtedly be obvious to everyone.
